Thanks for having a look at the ticket. I'd be happy to rewrite the
patch to include **kwargs support, if that's what people want.
However, there's no precedent in django for a tag accepting args *and*
kwargs (that I am aware of.) What would the syntax look like?
{% simple_tag arg1 arg2 with hi="l
A javascript testing framework is most desirable. Thanks for your
work so far - what can we do?
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Julien Phalip wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> On Jun 18, 4:24 am, Sean Bleier wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> A couple months ago I started work on a django branch [1] (with th
Hi Sean,
On Jun 18, 4:24 am, Sean Bleier wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> A couple months ago I started work on a django branch [1] (with the help of
> @jezdez) that introduces a framework for writing javascript unit tests using
> QUnit[2]. I started with QUnit because Django already included jQuery
Hi all,
I've created a ticket for this to get a final decision and feedback:
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/16293
Cal
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 6:53 PM, akaariai wrote:
> On Jun 17, 8:02 pm, Ian Kelly wrote:
> > The thing is, this is a DB API snippet, not a Django snippet
> > specifica
Hi,
On Jun 17, 2:18 pm, Anatoly Vostryakov wrote:
> I've thought today. May be it will possible to add support of
> parameters for functions or object methods in django templates.
> I mean, something like this in django template:
The compiler is able to handle this case, but the syntax of the D
Hey,
I've got a reusable app that offers the functionality you're looking for, I
think. I just commented on the ticket, so I hope this doesn't count as
double-posting, but you can check it out here:
https://github.com/trapeze/fancy_tag
It's got unit tests, keyword argument support (like the ne
Hi Sean,
> A couple months ago I started work on a django branch [1] (with the help
> of @jezdez) that introduces a framework for writing javascript unit
> tests using QUnit[2]. I started with QUnit because Django already
> included jQuery in the admin and seemed like a natural extension, but it
On Jun 17, 1:48 pm, Matt Bennett wrote:
> > This is a case for a custom Filter object [1]. The filter object
> > implementation would only be a few lines, to reject logging when DEBUG
> > is True, and can be attached to the admin email handler in the default
> > logging configuration. [2] This way
On 18.06.2011, at 03:38, Stephen Burrows wrote:
> I would love it if someone could look at 13956 [1]
>
> [1] http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/13956
I'd like to repeat my concerns from the ticket that it seems odd to extend the
helper tags with support for *args but leaving out **kwargs. If t
On Jun 18, 11:38 am, Stephen Burrows
wrote:
> I would love it if someone could look at 13956 [1]
RFC'd, thanks ;)
Julien
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.
10 matches
Mail list logo