Re: Test reordering and TransactionTestCase cleanup

2012-07-09 Thread Anssi Kääriäinen
On 10 heinä, 00:35, Ramiro Morales wrote: > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Anssi Kääriäinen > > wrote: > > > I would like to just get rid of the sequence resets. Oracle doesn't do > > it currently, TestCase doesn't do it, and IMO assuming the IDs are >

Re: Test reordering and TransactionTestCase cleanup

2012-07-09 Thread Ramiro Morales
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Anssi Kääriäinen wrote: > > I would like to just get rid of the sequence resets. Oracle doesn't do > it currently, TestCase doesn't do it, and IMO assuming the IDs are > going to start from 1 is an assumption one should not make. > >

Re: Skip session save on 500 responses

2012-07-09 Thread Luke Plant
On 09/07/12 20:07, Anssi Kääriäinen wrote: > I have updated the branch [https://github.com/akaariai/django/tree/ > ticket_3881], I think it now has all the necessary doc changes. If > somebody is kind enough to double-check the patch, that would be > great. If that somebody is a committer,

Re: GSoC Check-in: Security Enhancements

2012-07-09 Thread Rohan Jain
Hi, This check-in is a little delayed. Meanwhile, I continued working on CSRF and started a on centralized tokenization. As I had posted, I implemented the permitted domains system, as `CSRF_PERMITTED_DOMAINS`. I did some minor cleanups and tests, the behaviour is mostly the same. Since with the

Re: Skip session save on 500 responses

2012-07-09 Thread Anssi Kääriäinen
On 9 heinä, 19:59, Don Spaulding wrote: > On Saturday, July 7, 2012 3:46:14 AM UTC-5, Florian Apolloner wrote: > > > On Friday, July 6, 2012 12:02:56 AM UTC+2, Luke Plant wrote: > > >> I agree it should be changed, and I would regard it as a bug fix, but > >> make a note

Re: Skip session save on 500 responses

2012-07-09 Thread Don Spaulding
On Saturday, July 7, 2012 3:46:14 AM UTC-5, Florian Apolloner wrote: > > On Friday, July 6, 2012 12:02:56 AM UTC+2, Luke Plant wrote: >> >> I agree it should be changed, and I would regard it as a bug fix, but >> make a note of it in the 1.5 release notes nonetheless. >> > > +1 > > Cheers, >

Djonet, the MonetDB backend for Django

2012-07-09 Thread Gijs Molenaar
Hi Django dev, I'm working on a MonetDB backend for Django called djonet: https://github.com/gijzelaerr/djonet Feel free to test it and let me know if it works for you. I think most stuff is sort of working, but when I run the Django test suite with a djonet settings some errors pop up that

Re: About: Feature request: Comments in Django models saved to database schema

2012-07-09 Thread Andrei Antoukh
2012/7/9 Anssi Kääriäinen > On 7 heinä, 22:25, Andrei Antoukh wrote: > > Hello! > > > > I am writing about the issues: > https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/13867https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/18468 > > > > I am not the author of these issues, but

Re: About: Feature request: Comments in Django models saved to database schema

2012-07-09 Thread Anssi Kääriäinen
On 7 heinä, 22:25, Andrei Antoukh wrote: > Hello! > > I am writing about the > issues:https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/13867https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/18468 > > I am not the author of these issues, but I think this feature is > interesting to have in the ORM. > I