Re: Provide a way to lookup valid dict items

On Tuesday, 4 December 2012 14:25:22 UTC+10, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > > > Now, I'll completely grant that the same "private" interpretation doesn't > apply to dictionary keys in the Python context, but: > > 1) From a Django template language perspective, there's no syntactic > difference

Re: Provide a way to lookup valid dict items

On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Ryan Stuart wrote: > Hi All, > > I recently discovered that there is no way in the Django template syntax > to access all valid items of a dict. For example, as I understand it, it is > impossible to access the only item of this dict: > >

Re: Proposal: use SQLAlchemy Core for query generation

вторник, 4 декабря 2012 г., 0:48:04 UTC+2 пользователь Ivan написал: > > >1. Allows to use both, Django-ORM + SQLAlchemy. Single connection. >SQLAlchemy's models are generated automatically form Django's models. >https://github.com/Deepwalker/aldjemy > > Sorry for bad link. This is

Provide a way to lookup valid dict items

Hi All, I recently discovered that there is no way in the Django template syntax to access all valid items of a dict. For example, as I understand it, it is impossible to access the only item of this dict: my_dict = {"_key": "value"} This is despite this dict being perfectly valid and not

Re: Proposal: use SQLAlchemy Core for query generation

Hi all, I've viewed a few interesting solutions. 1. Allows to use both, Django-ORM + SQLAlchemy. Single connection. SQLAlchemy's models are generated automatically form Django's models. https://github.com/Deepwalker/aldjemy 2. Uses only Django's ORM, but allows to use 4 SQLBuilders

Re: Proposal: use SQLAlchemy Core for query generation

See also syntax evolution of peewee ORM, which initially was Django's lightweight clone. http://peewee.readthedocs.org/en/latest/peewee/upgrading.html#goals-for-the-new-api -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To view this

Re: I'd like to make a contribution to the wiki

On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Harry Percival wrote: > Hi Russell, thanks for getting back to us. Here's our info: > > Hi Harry, I've just posted those updates, and done the cleanups you suggested. Yours, Russ Magee %-) -- You received this message because you are