Hi,
Quoting ticket 5908 <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5908>:
"Under the following example, I would expect the cycle tag's internal
counter to be reset after leaving the inner loop. That way it'd be 'nesting
safe' :-)
{% for group in grouped %}
{% for item in group.list %}
... {% cycle row1,row2,row3 %} ...
{% endfor %}
{% endfor %}
"
Actually, the current behaviour is not to reset between loops. Is that
intentional?
A patch to ticket 5908 <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5908> adds a
reset_cycle tag, which resets the cycle-loop. I am wondering if it is the
right way to solve this problem, or whether it would be better to modify
cycle's current behaviour to reset the loop after each endfor; or maybe if
we want another kind of cycle which allows for setting both options?
What do you think?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/django-developers/-/ijbkyiGiKykJ.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
