Re: Time to drop support for Oracle < 11?

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Shai Berger wrote: > Hi Tim and all, > > On Saturday 14 June 2014 03:52:57 Tim Graham wrote: >> >> Release - GA Date - Premier Support Ends - Extended Support Ends >> >> 11.1 - Aug 2007 - Aug 2012 - Aug 2015 >> 10.2 - Jul 2005 - Jul 2010 - Jul 2013 >> 10.1 Jan 2004

Re: Time to drop support for Oracle < 11?

Personally we use oracle 11g (with a plan to move to 12c within the next year), but it wasn't that long ago that we were still using 10g. We're a smaller company that is able to upgrade our database without significant impact, but I'm betting (and guessing..) the vast majority of oracle users a

Re: Time to drop support for Oracle < 11?

Hi Tim and all, On Saturday 14 June 2014 03:52:57 Tim Graham wrote: > > Release - GA Date - Premier Support Ends - Extended Support Ends > > 11.1 - Aug 2007 - Aug 2012 - Aug 2015 > 10.2 - Jul 2005 - Jul 2010 - Jul 2013 > 10.1 Jan 2004 - Jan 2009 - Jan 2012 > 9.2 Jul 2002 - Jul 2007 - Jul 2010 >

Time to drop support for Oracle < 11?

Hi Shai and Oracle users, I came across a ticket (#11580 ) which proposes a fix that works on Oracle > 11 but not for older versions along with the suggestion: "Perhaps it makes sense to abandon support for Oracle versions below 11g in Django 1.6 or

Re: 3rd-party database backends: Do you need a "can_introspect_null" feature flag?

On Friday 13 June 2014 08:52:29 Aymeric Augustin wrote: > > Le 13 juin 2014 à 01:30, Michael Manfre a écrit : > >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Shai Berger wrote: > >> > >> Bug #22816[1] is a test failure on Oracle. It was caused by the > >> introduction of the "can_introspect_null" database

Re: [GSOC] Weekly update

I like this simplification a lot. I hope you can make it work. Just check that you don't "overload" fields, by storing in field objects information that doesn't belong there. -- Aymeric. On 13 juin 2014, at 19:53, Daniel Pyrathon wrote: > Hi All, > > This week's work was a follow-up of la

Re: [GSOC] Weekly update

Hi All, This week's work was a follow-up of last week's work, with some new discoveries with regards to the new API: *1) Improved the current _meta implementation of unittests* I refactored the current meta unittest branch into a more compact version. I also added test cases for Generic Foreign

Re: Offline Appcache/Reponse Headers

Please use django-users for usage questions (although it's not clear your question is about Django and not Firefox). This list is for the discussion of the development of Django itself. On Friday, June 13, 2014 9:34:57 AM UTC-4, Max wrote: > > Hi there, > > I am trying to build an offline-django

Offline Appcache/Reponse Headers

Hi there, I am trying to build an offline-django(1.6.5)-app (a single page for the beginning). I am serving a manifest-file with correct mime-type (text/cache-manifest), linking it with the -tag, rendered in a template. The page is cached and shown offline in chrome, but not in IE11 nor Firefox