Fellow Report - June 20, 2015

2015-06-20 Thread Tim Graham
Report for week ending June 20, 2015: Triaged --- https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24985 - Provide a way to sanitize invalid characters from Rss201rev2Feed (accepted) https://github.com/django/djangoproject.com/issues/492 - SelectDateWidget(empty_label) is not working (invalid) ht

DecimalField with no max_digits and decimal_places

2015-06-20 Thread Shai Berger
Hi, Django's DecimalField requires both max_digits and decimal_places. Database backends allow them to be dropped, to specify an "unlimited precision" field. Adding support for this in Django is probably not very helpful for new apps, but can help significantly in using Django against legacy da

Re: Misleading Documentation on Model Field Reference

2015-06-20 Thread Tim Graham
Feel free to propose a ticket and pull request. I don't think this needs much discussion on the mailing list. Thanks! On Saturday, June 20, 2015 at 9:19:47 AM UTC-4, Christian Schmitt wrote: > > Hello, I read carefully through out the Django Docs and found one comment > really misleading ( > htt

Misleading Documentation on Model Field Reference

2015-06-20 Thread Christian Schmitt
Hello, I read carefully through out the Django Docs and found one comment really misleading (https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.8/ref/models/fields/#foreignkey): > Behind the scenes, Django appends "_id" to the field name to create its database column name. In the above example, > the database

Re: delegating our static file serving

2015-06-20 Thread David Evans
On Friday, 5 December 2014 19:14:29 UTC, Carl Meyer wrote: > > On 12/04/2014 10:33 PM, Collin Anderson wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I'm pretty interested in getting secure and _somewhat_ efficient static > > file serving in Django. > > > > Quick history: > > 2005 - Jacob commits #428: a "stati

Re: Any chances to see Django benefit from new Async features of Python 3.5 ?

2015-06-20 Thread Ɓukasz Rekucki
Considering that PEP 492 is mostly about new syntax, it's not really possible to write code in the core that will work in earlier Python versions. Unless you wrap everything into some compatibility later, but that defeats the purpose of the PEP. Also, Django doesn't really have any asynchronous pa

Any chances to see Django benefit from new Async features of Python 3.5 ?

2015-06-20 Thread Benjamin Melki
Hi, are there any chances for a future Django version to benefit from new built in Python async features ( https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0492/ ) ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To u