Hi Robert,
I don't exactly know which release introduced this change but I'd bet on
1.8.0 since a lot template related logic was refactored during its
development.
If you want to isolate the exact commit I'd suggest you try bisecting [1]
Django's source.
I think the change was unintentional
I can't tell which exact release introduced this, since I went directly
from 1.7.9 to 1.8.3, but one of my templates suddenly started rendering
differently when I did.
The template had a typo with one of its {# #}-style template comments; it
was accidentally written as: {# comment here %}.
+1
Sent from my iPad
> On Jul 30, 2015, at 6:19 AM, Collin Anderson wrote:
>
> I like the behavior of showing the login screen if they don't have
> permission. It's simple and pretty friendly. The new hint is helpful too.
>
>> On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 4:16:58 PM
I like the behavior of showing the login screen if they don't have
permission. It's simple and pretty friendly. The new hint is helpful too.
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 4:16:58 PM UTC-4, Carl Meyer wrote:
>
> On 07/28/2015 12:36 PM, Tim Graham wrote:
> > We received a ticket [1] noting that
I am wary of privacy implications (leaking referers) of making it too easy to
use a CDN, all the more since the admin is lightweight and not
performance-critical.
--
Aymeric.
> Le 30 juil. 2015 à 11:05, Marc Tamlyn a écrit :
>
> One thing that might be nice to do with
> Le 29 juil. 2015 à 18:25, Podrigal, Aron a écrit :
>
> I see models as what defines the database ddl and and not a representation
> from a end users perspective.
Django models do a bit more than this: see the `validators` argument,
EmailField, etc.
> And I see the
One thing that might be nice to do with the admin, especially in the
context of the fonts but also with jQuery, is to give an easy override to
use CDN versions of the files. Django still needs to bundle them for
offline work, and the default should be to include Django's own ones, but
it would be
Le 29 juil. 2015 à 13:13, elky a écrit :
>
> I can create small kit which will contain only icons that used in the project
> - it will allow us to save about 70KB. But the question is - how to support
> this kit in future if someone decide to add new icons ?
Indeed, it