Re: #25227 Add utility method `get_updated_model()` to `ModelForm`

On Saturday, 8 August 2015 02:38:09 UTC+10, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: > > 2015-08-07 16:51 GMT+02:00 Martin Owens : > > > Could we use something simple like 'update()' and 'commit()' to which > save > > would call both? > > Or `.apply()` and `.commit()` not to suggest that the

Re: Future of the development server's auto-reloading

The idea sounds awesome. A couple of corner cases that should be taken in consideration: - I think it is common for small simple projects (and people doing the tutorial) to have the sqlite db file in the same project directory. If we're watching for writes in every file in the project directory,

Re: Future of the development server's auto-reloading

This all makes sense to me, but it would be nice if it worked out of the box, especially for the purposes of the tutorial. :) On Saturday, August 8, 2015 at 5:53:32 PM UTC-4, Aymeric Augustin wrote: > > Hello, > > While writing some horrific code [1] related to the development server’s >

Re: Ticket #25236: Remove ifequal from the template language

Hi All, I really like the "don't use this on new code, but there's no rush in replacing it" category. I think that's really important to have that in a project that's this old. I think it would be great to minimize the amount required changes that need to be done. Thanks, Collin -- You

Re: how to get selectd checkboxes values in django from html?

This mailing list is for the development of Django itself, please write to django-users On Sunday, August 9, 2015 at 2:54:06 AM UTC+2, ghanshyam dudhatra wrote: > > > > > HOBBIES > > > Drawing >

Re: Future of the development server's auto-reloading

On Saturday, August 8, 2015 at 11:53:32 PM UTC+2, Aymeric Augustin wrote: > > - It doesn’t survive a syntax error in the settings module. I have reasons > to believe that this would be extremely messy to fix. > - If a module reads a configuration file on disk at startup and caches it, > the

Re: Future of the development server's auto-reloading

Hi Aymeric, While I have wondered from time to time why runserver could not just continue after certain syntax errors, and wished it could do so, I think what you are proposing makes a lot of sense. I think having to manually reload after installing a new package is really acceptable (and more an