Re: GSOC 2017 Project Idea - Improve ORM by introducing real VirtualField and related field clean up

I have been working to understand the complexity for few months. I will try to share my findings very soon. Lets see where I can reach before the deadline. On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 12:26 AM, Tim Graham wrote: > It could be a suitable project, however, it's too late to develop a > proposal of tha

Re: To keep or not to keep: logging of undefined template variables

Doesn't sound like there's much impetus either way, and it's confusing people, so I'd say remove it. Or maybe make it optional, default off? On 19 March 2017 at 07:52, Tim Martin wrote: > I don't have any objection to removing this. However, the thought occurs > that my patch to the handling of

Re: GSOC 2017 Project Idea - Improve ORM by introducing real VirtualField and related field clean up

It could be a suitable project, however, it's too late to develop a proposal of that complexity for this summer. A prospective student would need to demonstrate significant understanding of the ORM before I would advise them to tackle that topic. On Sunday, March 19, 2017 at 1:16:02 PM UTC-4, A

Re: How Channels and Daphne handle huge HTTP requests?

Hi Alexander, I believe Daphne does not yet implement body_channel support for large HTTP requests, just the response version right now. It's on the roadmap, I just need to get round to adding it in. Until then, I would advise not using it for large uploads. Andrew On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 1:17 A

GSOC 2017 Project Idea - Improve ORM by introducing real VirtualField and related field clean up

Hi, I have been working on understanding previous works related to composite ForeiegnKey/PrimaryKey support/ VirtualField support, works/tickets on Fields API/RelationField API improvement/clean ups etc. Is it a good idea to prepare something like this for gsoc this year? I have also trying to

Re: SQLAlchemy integration - More details

Hi, Have you considered using Peewee ? It’s easier to use, lighter, and from what I measured over time, it’s way faster. It even has a light Django integration .

How Channels and Daphne handle huge HTTP requests?

Dear Colleagues, I tried to understand how Channels and Daphne work with single-reader channels in case when there is huge HTTP request. To my surprise I have not found any code in Daphne which works with `body_channel`. The only occurrence of `body_channel` I found is in the test `assert_vali

Re: Add ability to choose a different secret for PasswordResetToken

On Saturday, March 18, 2017 at 11:11:38 AM UTC+1, jann@googlemail.com wrote: > > I'll give the override_settings a closer look, but this seems like > something one wouldn't want in a production environment. > Yes, this is only ment for tests. -- You received this message because you are

Re: To keep or not to keep: logging of undefined template variables

I don't have any objection to removing this. However, the thought occurs that my patch to the handling of undefined variables could enhance this to make it more useful. I think we could log in the case where a conditional expression actually depends on an undefined variable. I haven't thought a