Thank you all for the feedback, I’ve changed the method to be bulk_update()
as this seems to be the most liked option. Naming things is hard, and while
bulk_update() isn’t perfect I think it’s a bit better than
bulk_update_fields() or just update_fields().
On 16 September 2018 at 10:19:40, Tobi
>
> I would require some kind of configuration to define which response
> content-type should be encoded by which algorithm.
I think there's room there to support custom tactics, for example content
length may also be useful to determine which algorithms are applicable, or
perhaps compression cou
On 18-09-15 23:15:10, Adam Johnson wrote:
>> I agree bulk_save() maybe is not the best name as people might expect
>> signals to be sent, but are there any suggestions other than bulk_update()?
>> Maybe something more accurate, like bulk_update_fields()? Or
>> bulk_save_fields()?
>
>bulk_update_fie