Yes, you can assign it to yourself.
If you get stuck, post of the forum.djangoproject.com Mentorship topic.
Welcome aboard! ⛵️
C.
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 11:43, Vibhu Agarwal wrote:
> Hi Carlton
>
> Thanks for finding me this issue.
>
> I've set up django dev. locally.
> I'm looking into this
Maybe... it's still more verbose for no gain as I see it.
I think the default implicit chaining is correct in the default case. It's
only if you want to adjust that (or suppress is with `from None`) that the
extra clause comes in handy. I think using the default unless there's a
reason not to
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 12:23 PM Carlton Gibson
wrote:
> > I'm basing it on the fact that Carlton approved this PR for the style
> guide: https://github.com/django/django/pull/12350
>
> No. I don't think we should merge that change. (It's "approved" qua itself
> before reviewing, and dependent on
Hi! Thanks for the heads up.
I'll remember to reproduce the bug locally, working on latest dev. branch
and also ping the owner of ticket before starting to work for the patch.
On Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 2:27:00 PM UTC+5:30, Adam Johnson wrote:
>
> Hi Vibhu
>
> Thank you for your
Hi Carlton
Thanks for finding me this issue.
I've set up django dev. locally.
I'm looking into this issue now and I'll try to submit a patch asap :)
Should I claim this ticket?
On Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 2:25:08 PM UTC+5:30, Carlton Gibson wrote:
>
> Hi Vibhu
>
> Take a look at:
> I'm basing it on the fact that Carlton approved this PR for the style
guide: https://github.com/django/django/pull/12350
No. I don't think we should merge that change. (It's "approved" qua itself
before reviewing, and dependent on the main PR.)
To be clear. I think the default implicit
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 12:27 AM Aymeric Augustin <
aymeric.augus...@polytechnique.org> wrote:
> Hello Ram,
>
> On 6 Feb 2020, at 19:08, Ram Rachum wrote:
>
> In other words, "raise from" is the inevitable future, it's just that
> we're not in a rush to get there.
>
>
> I'm not sure how you came
