Re: South's --update equivalent for Django 1.7 migrations

2014-10-09 Thread Petri Lehtinen
Shai Berger wrote: > On Thursday 09 October 2014 09:53:44 Andrew Godwin wrote: > > > > The logic is not too complex, but the feature would need to be > > dependency-aware and delete any migrations that depended on the updated > > migration before it re-ran makemigrations; in addition, if no

Re: South's --update equivalent for Django 1.7 migrations

2014-10-09 Thread Petri Lehtinen
Andrew Godwin wrote: > --update was a feature contributed to South that I didn't write, but pulled in > and everyone found useful; I didn't get it in for the 1.7 release as there > were > time constraints, but I'd definitely be open to seeing it re-added. > > The logic is not too complex, but

Re: South's --update equivalent for Django 1.7 migrations

2014-10-08 Thread Petri Lehtinen
On Thursday, October 9, 2014 12:01:45 AM UTC+3, Curtis Maloney wrote: > > Since I didn't know about the update feature in South... can you explain > how it would be different from migration squashing in 1.7? > South's schemamigration --update has very little to do with migration squashing.

South's --update equivalent for Django 1.7 migrations

2014-10-08 Thread Petri Lehtinen
Hi! The database migration system in Django 1.7 is really great and seems to work very well. However, since I'm a long-time South user, there's one feature that I'm missing: the possibility to update an existing migration (the --update flag to South's schemamigration command). I think it's an