Re: #9344 and policy for small bug reports

2009-02-09 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 09:22 -0800, rajeesh wrote: > I just want to register a similar issue. Had opened a ticket, #10057, > with patch on a trivial matter as http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/10057. > Haven't found even any comments regarding its feasibility etc. Can't > figure out whether

Re: #9344 and policy for small bug reports

2009-02-08 Thread rajeesh
I just want to register a similar issue. Had opened a ticket, #10057, with patch on a trivial matter as http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/10057. Haven't found even any comments regarding its feasibility etc. Can't figure out whether people are engaged for some milestone coming but this seems

Re: #9344 and policy for small bug reports

2009-01-23 Thread Graham King
Very helpful information from Karen and Russell, thanks. I have written it up for the Contributing section of the FAQ: http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/10110 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: #9344 and policy for small bug reports

2009-01-23 Thread Karen Tracey
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 3:14 AM, Julien Phalip wrote: > Thank you Karen for this detailed answer. Your reasoning regarding > this ticket does make a lot of sense. I totally agree with you that > tests are highly important and that this ticket is lacking useful > information

Re: #9344 and policy for small bug reports

2009-01-23 Thread Julien Phalip
On Jan 23, 6:42 pm, Karen Tracey wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Julien Phalip wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I just wanted to draw your attention to what appears to be a bug in > > Django: the 'tell()' proxy is missing from the Windows-specific > >

Re: #9344 and policy for small bug reports

2009-01-23 Thread Julien Phalip
On Jan 23, 5:14 pm, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Julien Phalip wrote: > > > Now, I know that this is sort of an edge case, and I also know that > > there are more important and more urgent matters at this moment. But >

Re: #9344 and policy for small bug reports

2009-01-22 Thread Karen Tracey
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Julien Phalip wrote: > > Hi, > > I just wanted to draw your attention to what appears to be a bug in > Django: the 'tell()' proxy is missing from the Windows-specific > implementation of TemporaryFile. This causes Django to crash when >

Re: #9344 and policy for small bug reports

2009-01-22 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Julien Phalip wrote: > > Now, I know that this is sort of an edge case, and I also know that > there are more important and more urgent matters at this moment. But > I'd be keen to hear what is the official (or tacit) policy for that > kind of

Re: #9344 and policy for small bug reports

2009-01-22 Thread Ivan Sagalaev
Julien Phalip wrote: > There probably are a few other tickets in > that situation (#9404 is another example). And http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/9591 is yet another. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

#9344 and policy for small bug reports

2009-01-22 Thread Julien Phalip
Hi, I just wanted to draw your attention to what appears to be a bug in Django: the 'tell()' proxy is missing from the Windows-specific implementation of TemporaryFile. This causes Django to crash when manipulating the uploaded file with PIL, for example. Ticket #9344 contains a patch to fix