Re: 5 for 1?

Thank you aaugustin for taking a look at https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/13794. I've made some further updates but haven't heard anything back in a few weeks. Even though the original ticket title and description makes it sound like a fairly minor bug I do want to point out that as with

5 for 1?

Not sure if this is still a thing, but i'd like to ask for a review of this ticket: https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/13794 I triaged/reviewed the following tickets: #18201, #19668, #19663, #19617, #19624 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Anyone have time for a 5-for-1?

On 3 loka, 03:51, Stephen Burrows wrote: > I was hoping someone could have a look > at:*https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/14567* Committed. > *https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/11027* Some thoughts given in the

5 for 1

I reviewed: #16358 #16355 #16359 #16353 #16316 Please look at #15829 (https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/15829). Thanks, Michael Manfre -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to

Re: 5-for-1?

artially. > > > Fortunately there is a good (new) convention in Django how to write kwarg > > style template parameters, thanks to Chris Beaven's with/include tag > > refactor > > (``{% with arg1=1 arg2=2 %}{{ arg1 }}: {{ args2 }}{% endwith %}``), which > > could al

Re: 5-for-1?

, which > could also be used for the tag helpers. > > Jannis > >> On Jun 7, 12:24 pm, Carl Meyer <c...@oddbird.net> wrote: >>> Hi Stephen, >>> >>> On 06/07/2011 02:37 AM, Stephen Burrows wrote: >>> >>>> Hi - is the 5-for-1 deal

Re: 5-for-1?

%}{{ arg1 }}: {{ args2 }}{% endwith %}``), which could also be used for the tag helpers. Jannis > On Jun 7, 12:24 pm, Carl Meyer <c...@oddbird.net> wrote: >> Hi Stephen, >> >> On 06/07/2011 02:37 AM, Stephen Burrows wrote: >> >>> Hi - is the 5-for-1 deal

Re: 5-for-1?

On Jun 18, 11:38 am, Stephen Burrows wrote: > I would love it if someone could look at 13956 [1] RFC'd, thanks ;) Julien -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to

Re: 5-for-1?

.com/ticket/13956 On Jun 7, 12:24 pm, Carl Meyer <c...@oddbird.net> wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > On 06/07/2011 02:37 AM, Stephen Burrows wrote: > > > Hi - is the 5-for-1 deal still active on ticket reviews? [1] > > If so, I've reviewed the following tickets: > > > 3

Re: 5-for-1?

Hi Stephen, On 06/07/2011 02:37 AM, Stephen Burrows wrote: > Hi - is the 5-for-1 deal still active on ticket reviews? [1] > If so, I've reviewed the following tickets: > > 3624 > 16152 > 16157 > 16158 > 16166 > > And would love it if someone could

5-for-1?

Hi - is the 5-for-1 deal still active on ticket reviews? [1] If so, I've reviewed the following tickets: 3624 16152 16157 16158 16166 And would love it if someone could have a look at ticket 14082 [2]. If not, ah well. :-) Best, --Stephen Burrows [1] http://groups.google.com/group/django

Re: [5-for-1] Review request

Hello, I would like a core dev's opinion on #11555. The tickets I reviewed are listed here: http://myks.org/stuff/django_5-for-1.txt Thanks, -- Aymeric Augustin. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group,

Re: [5-for-1] Review request

On 04/25/2011 05:33 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Jonas H. wrote: I'd like you to look into http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/15696. Done. Unfortunately, the result's probably not what you wanted. If you'd like to re-use your review

Re: [5-for-1] Review request

On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Jonas H. wrote: > I'd like you to look into http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/15696. Done. Unfortunately, the result's probably not what you wanted. If you'd like to re-use your review wuffie I'd happily take a look at something else

[5-for-1] Review request

Here's what I reviewed: http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/15783 http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/15774 http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/15801 http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/15896 http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/15895 I'd like you to look into

Re: [5-for-1] Review request

I noticed the "TODO" on the bottom of that page you linked... if you actually want to write something up for the docs about reviewing tickets (based on the discussion that's happened on the list the last few days) I'd suggest adding it to the /docs/howto/contribute section. Feel free to ping

Re: [5-for-1] Review request

On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 3:26 AM, Aymeric Augustin wrote: > I have retroactively added 5 tickets for Alex's review, plus 5 tickets that > I'd like to trade against a review of #15255, especially the second comment. Done! BTW, I'm pretty sure Alex was joking

Re: [5-for-1] Review request

2011/4/21 Alex Gaynor <alex.gay...@gmail.com> > As did I, do we have to retroactively require more reviews ;) > I'm now tracking my 5-for-1 deals here: http://myks.org/stuff/django_5-for-1.txt I have retroactively added 5 tickets for Alex's review, plus 5 tickets that I'd like to t

Re: [5-for-1] Review request

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Aymeric Augustin > wrote: > > I reviewed 5 new tickets: #15782, #15792, #15793, #15795, #15798. I'd > like > > someone to take a look at #14091. >

Re: [5-for-1] Review request

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Aymeric Augustin wrote: > I reviewed 5 new tickets: #15782, #15792, #15793, #15795, #15798. I'd like > someone to take a look at #14091. Done - thank you! I left comments on the ticket. Jacob -- You received this message

[5-for-1] Review request

Hello, I suggest we gather review requests on this thread to make the core devs' job easier (that is, until the thread becomes too long). I reviewed 5 new tickets: #15782, #15792, #15793, #15795, #15798. I'd like someone to take a look at #14091. Best regards, -- Aymeric Augustin. -- You