Re: App Name

Hi bro, you can use this {% url 'home' %} the app_name isn't the namespace, the namespace is define on the main urls.py, if you haven't a namespace defined, so, with the name assined on the path() is sufficient greetings! *Franklin

Re: App Name

uot;. In my opinion, either a blank app name or 'self' would be a better choice for that special value. And it would cause a lot of issue. It might break existing Django app, which is bad. It will make finding all references if an URL in you code harder as you need to search for both the absolute a

App Name

Hello, If in the urls.py, I can write: *app_name* = '*posts*' . . path(' ', views.home, name='home'), then why it is required to refer url name (from the template) by the *app_name value* as: {% url '*posts*:home' %} It should be referred instead by *app_name variable* like below: {% url

Re: Proposal: Django Admin Site and "pretty" app name

but somewhat tedious cleanup - mostly involving backing out the metaclass pattern for app objects. The crux will be a way to introduce this in form that provides some limited, targeted benefits such as the verbose app name, without opening too much of a pandora's box of enabling a range

Re: Proposal: Django Admin Site and "pretty" app name

and at that time, it was extremely close to being ready for merging -- it >> mostly just needed eyeballs, testing, and documentation. If you want to >> help out, I'd suggest grabbing that code, and trying to (a) get it up to >> date, and (b) testing it with your own projects, a

Re: Proposal: Django Admin Site and "pretty" app name

ust needed eyeballs, testing, and documentation. If you want to > help out, I'd suggest grabbing that code, and trying to (a) get it up to > date, and (b) testing it with your own projects, and © helping to stub out > documentation. > > I'd very much like to see this patch land as p

Re: Proposal: Django Admin Site and "pretty" app name

alls, testing, and documentation. If you want to help out, I'd suggest grabbing that code, and trying to (a) get it up to date, and (b) testing it with your own projects, and © helping to stub out documentation. I'd very much like to see this patch land as part of the 1.6 cycle -- App name trans

Re: Proposal: Django Admin Site and "pretty" app name

Ramiro, I've read the ticket but it seems stuck. I just want it to go forward because I think it's a major UI/UX issue for non-programmers the lack of "pretty" app names. But I want it to be done right with a proper app metadata handling. The thing is that there isn't any consensus about the

Re: Proposal: Django Admin Site and "pretty" app name

On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Aymeric Augustin wrote: > FYI the latest efforts on this topic are here: > https://github.com/ptone/django/compare/app-loading > http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3591 Exactly, The issue described in this thread is already

Re: Proposal: Django Admin Site and "pretty" app name

I read the tickets. Many are outdated and the approach in the trac ticket below I believe it's not very well defined. About putting app names on the INSTALLED_APPS, I don't think it would be good for packaging. That's why I believe it should be somewhere on the app itself. About using admin.py

Re: Proposal: Django Admin Site and "pretty" app name

FYI the latest efforts on this topic are here: https://github.com/ptone/django/compare/app-loading http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3591 -- Aymeric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to

Re: Proposal: Django Admin Site and "pretty" app name

This is important not only for internationalization, but also for English app names, consisting of several words. Neither Siteconfig nor Site_config look pretty. I think that app name should not be defined as a static variable in __init__.py file for this reason: if we want to translate the label

Re: Proposal: Django Admin Site and "pretty" app name

As an alternative to creating AppConfig class, what about registering app names, just like we register ModelAdmin instances: admin.site.register_app_label("myapp", _("My awesome web app")) - Sergiy On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Pedro J. Aramburu wrote: > As I

Proposal: Django Admin Site and "pretty" app name

As I explained on the Django users forums ( https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/django-users/ZUxZHi_-5ug) I'm spanish speaking so my users are too. Writing code in spanish isn't pretty and with characters like "á" or "ñ" it's very difficult to name the apps a way that would make

Re: app name in admin breadcrumbs

On 9/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is there a reason why the app name doesn't appear in the admin > breadcrumbs? I have an app with a model called 'Groups', and the > breadcrumb for it is the same as that for the auth model 'Groups'. The > URL is rig

app name in admin breadcrumbs

Is there a reason why the app name doesn't appear in the admin breadcrumbs? I have an app with a model called 'Groups', and the breadcrumb for it is the same as that for the auth model 'Groups'. The URL is right, of course, I just thought it might be sensible to stick the app name in there, so