On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:59 PM, jameslon...@gmail.com <
jameslon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This is a great solution; when I wrote this post I was sure no one had
> really run into the problem. I will use this for serializing my DB in
> the future. Though, the last paragraph of your reply states
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 4:48 AM, jameslon...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> There is a small road block that makes contenttype a little dangerous
> to use during application development. Especially in regards to
> serializing your data to different databases. During syncdb the
>
This is a great solution; when I wrote this post I was sure no one had
really run into the problem. I will use this for serializing my DB in
the future. Though, the last paragraph of your reply states that
content type doesn't define app_label and model as unique. I believe
that this is true now,
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 1:48 PM, jameslon...@gmail.com <
jameslon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> There is a small road block that makes contenttype a little dangerous
> to use during application development. Especially in regards to
> serializing your data to different databases. During syncdb the
>
There is a small road block that makes contenttype a little dangerous
to use during application development. Especially in regards to
serializing your data to different databases. During syncdb the
contenttypes are generated in a way that makes regeneration at a later
date inconsistent with the