thank you all for your feedback.
I think it would be good to reference from the individual page to the
matching comparison grid (if one exists). It tells
newcomers: Professionals do re-use, they don't re-invent.
For example the python docs sometimes have a box called "See also" which
contains
My main concern is that it might appear that Django officially endorses the
website, and that it might not be clear to developers that Django isn't
directly involved with all those third party packages - which could be
potentially harmful.
I'm also think that if you start linking to a grid for
On 1 févr. 2016, at 12:20, Markus Holtermann wrote:
> I think that links to 3rd party pages with grids, comparisons, pros'n'cons,
> scattered all over Django's documentation aren't too helpful.
I agree. I’m +0 on linking to Django packages on a page that talks about
I think that links to 3rd party pages with grids, comparisons, pros'n'cons,
scattered all over Django's documentation aren't too helpful. I'd probably
prefer a separate page in the docs that links to those 3rd party pages. The
general problem with those sites though, they are not audited for
It seems like a good proposal, It would be good to know why Sergei doesn't
think it is appropiate for Django to add links to third party package
comparison grids.
django-rest-framework links to third party extensions in its documentation
and this had a positive effect on the whole DRF
This ticket was closed as invalid:
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/26159
{{{
Here comes a pull request to add a link to the djangopackages comparison
grid "Pagination".
Background: The pagination in django core is only very basic. Most people
want more. I think re-use helps more then