Re: Yak shaving the test framework on the way to pluggable user models (#3011)

2012-08-30 Thread Roger Barnes
On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 6:04:09 PM UTC+10, Alex Ogier wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 3:44 AM, Russell Keith-Magee > wrote: > > > > I suppose you could see it as a semantic nuance. However, to my mind, > > there is a different. A skipped test is something

Re: Yak shaving the test framework on the way to pluggable user models (#3011)

2012-08-29 Thread Alex Ogier
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 3:44 AM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > > I suppose you could see it as a semantic nuance. However, to my mind, > there is a different. A skipped test is something that could -- or > even *should* be run -- but can't due to missing some optional >

Re: Yak shaving the test framework on the way to pluggable user models (#3011)

2012-08-25 Thread Julien Phalip
On Aug 25, 2012, at 1:15 AM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > Hi all, > > So, I've been working on a Django branch [1] to implement the approach > to pluggable user models that was decided upon earlier this year [2] > > [1] https://github.com/freakboy3742/django/tree/t3011 > [2]

Re: Yak shaving the test framework on the way to pluggable user models (#3011)

2012-08-25 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Aymeric Augustin wrote: > On 25 août 2012, at 10:15, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > >> We *could* just mark the affected tests that require auth.User as >> "skipUnless(user model == auth.User)", but that would mean some >>