Re: auth.User: a new approach

2009-10-22 Thread zellyn
I would also consider a "last known good display name" field on the MinimalUser table, so things like contrib.comments have something to display as well as something to FK to. I am interested in figuring this one out too. If you do fork django on github, send me a pointer. I think it would take

Re: auth.User: a new approach

2009-10-21 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Hanne Moa wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 16:18, Russell Keith-Magee > wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Hanne Moa wrote: >>> >>> It doesn't look like Contrib-06, covering ticket

Re: auth.User: a new approach

2009-10-21 Thread Hanne Moa
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 16:18, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Hanne Moa wrote: >> >> It doesn't look like Contrib-06, covering ticket #3011, Allow for >> extendable user module, will be in for 1.2. This is >> my pony

Re: auth.User: a new approach

2009-10-20 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Hanne Moa wrote: > > It doesn't look like Contrib-06, covering ticket #3011, Allow for > extendable user module, will be in for 1.2. So: let's think afresh, > start from scratch, think about what we really, really want. This is > my pony for

auth.User: a new approach

2009-10-19 Thread Hanne Moa
It doesn't look like Contrib-06, covering ticket #3011, Allow for extendable user module, will be in for 1.2. So: let's think afresh, start from scratch, think about what we really, really want. This is my pony for *2.0*: The underlying problem of today's auth.User is IMO that it conflates two