I would also consider a "last known good display name" field on the
MinimalUser table, so things like contrib.comments have something to
display as well as something to FK to.
I am interested in figuring this one out too. If you do fork django on
github, send me a pointer. I think it would take
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Hanne Moa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 16:18, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Hanne Moa wrote:
>>>
>>> It doesn't look like Contrib-06, covering ticket
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 16:18, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Hanne Moa wrote:
>>
>> It doesn't look like Contrib-06, covering ticket #3011, Allow for
>> extendable user module, will be in for 1.2. This is
>> my pony
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Hanne Moa wrote:
>
> It doesn't look like Contrib-06, covering ticket #3011, Allow for
> extendable user module, will be in for 1.2. So: let's think afresh,
> start from scratch, think about what we really, really want. This is
> my pony for
It doesn't look like Contrib-06, covering ticket #3011, Allow for
extendable user module, will be in for 1.2. So: let's think afresh,
start from scratch, think about what we really, really want. This is
my pony for *2.0*:
The underlying problem of today's auth.User is IMO that it conflates
two