Re: Django Web Application Cost So Many memory

On Thursday, March 31, 2011 4:57:20 PM UTC+11, bird sky wrote: > > hi Graham: > i'm using the nginx+fcgi . And my startup command is below > > python manage.py runfcgi host=127.0.0.1 port=3033 method=prefork > pidfile=/var/run/fcgi.pid minspare=5 maxspare=30 maxchildren=60 >

Re: Django Web Application Cost So Many memory

Le 31 mars 2011 à 07:57, 付毅 a écrit : > hi Graham: > i'm using the nginx+fcgi . And my startup command is below > > python manage.py runfcgi host=127.0.0.1 port=3033 method=prefork > pidfile=/var/run/fcgi.pid minspare=5 maxspare=30 maxchildren=60 > maxrequests=200 > > p.s I've invite

Re: Django Web Application Cost So Many memory

hi Graham: i'm using the nginx+fcgi . And my startup command is below python manage.py runfcgi host=127.0.0.1 port=3033 method=prefork pidfile=/var/run/fcgi.pid minspare=5 maxspare=30 maxchildren=60 maxrequests=200 p.s I've invite you on gtalk, hope your response. On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at

Re: Django Web Application Cost So Many memory

hi Diederik: I think you can see something from my attach file, that indict i've 60M-70M per python process cost. That is because I start the flup with command below: python manager.py runfcgi host=127.0.0.1 port=3033 method=prefork pidfile=/var/run/fcgi.pid minspare=5 maxspare=30

Re: Django Web Application Cost So Many memory

Why are you using prefork MPM and running Django embedded that way. Prefork MPM may be fine for PHP, but it is a poor solution for fat Python web applications unless you are prepared to give it the necessary memory resources and configure Apache properly specifically for that single Python web

Re: Django Web Application Cost So Many memory

Op woensdag 30 maart 2011 17:48:38 schreef 付毅: > hi Xavier Ordoquy > So , you mean 60M per python process is in a normal status? I really > encouter this kind of website before Please note this is for the entire website, not per apache instance. There is one Django process (via mod_wsgi, or

Re: Django Web Application Cost So Many memory

I think 60M is fine. For us, with nginx in front of gunicorn, we can get many simultaneous connections per process. -Adam -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com. To

Re: Django Web Application Cost So Many memory

Hi, Sounds correct to me. Regards, Xavier. Le 30 mars 2011 à 17:48, 付毅 a écrit : > hi Xavier Ordoquy > So , you mean 60M per python process is in a normal status? I really encouter > this kind of website before > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Xavier Ordoquy

Re: Django Web Application Cost So Many memory

hi Xavier Ordoquy So , you mean 60M per python process is in a normal status? I really encouter this kind of website before On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Xavier Ordoquy wrote: > > Le 30 mars 2011 à 15:41, 付毅 a écrit : > > > i don't think 100 instance means to 100 CPUs.

Re: Django Web Application Cost So Many memory

Le 30 mars 2011 à 15:41, 付毅 a écrit : > i don't think 100 instance means to 100 CPUs. I just want to use http_load to > test pressure to my web server. if i make the 100 cocurrent request per > second with 100 cocurrent connection. I will make 100 python process instance > when I deploy my

Re: Django Web Application Cost So Many memory

hi Bennett: i attache my ps output file, just see the RSS column, that is the real memory usage for every instance On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:51 PM, James Bennett wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 8:41 AM, 付毅 wrote: > > i don't think 100 instance means

Re: Django Web Application Cost So Many memory

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 8:41 AM, 付毅 wrote: > i don't think 100 instance means to 100 CPUs. I just want to use http_load > to test pressure to my web server. if i make the 100 cocurrent request per > second with 100 cocurrent connection. I will make 100 python process >

Re: Django Web Application Cost So Many memory

I've found one of my app module has a large model. there are 207 models in models.py. When I add this app module into INSTALL_APPS, the process instance memory increase nearly 10M more. I think can I move these model classes out of my models.py file and move them in to another .py file. And when

Re: Django Web Application Cost So Many memory

i don't think 100 instance means to 100 CPUs. I just want to use http_load to test pressure to my web server. if i make the 100 cocurrent request per second with 100 cocurrent connection. I will make 100 python process instance when I deploy my web project in prefork environment. Any others agree

Re: Django Web Application Cost So Many memory

Hi, > Because > if an instance cost 60M memory, when I deploy my project in prefork > web server with 100 instance, i will cost 6GB memory. I don't think > this is a normal state. I hardly see the need for 100 instances. Could you elaborate on that need ? Imagine those 100 instances are

Re: Django Web Application Cost So Many memory

no. i don't use any cache, and I 've try to remove the app module which I doubt cost memory. I found that the most memory eater is the app module who has very large models.py On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 8:32 PM, moham...@efazati.org wrote: > do you have any cache ing? > > On

Re: Django Web Application Cost So Many memory

do you have any cache ing? On 03/30/2011 04:33 PM, bird sky wrote: Hello Everybody: I encounter a problem that my Django project, it has more than 60 app modules, and some models are very large, more than 30 fields . And when I startup my project, regardless of in development server, fast

Django Web Application Cost So Many memory

Hello Everybody: I encounter a problem that my Django project, it has more than 60 app modules, and some models are very large, more than 30 fields . And when I startup my project, regardless of in development server, fast cgi(flup),or mod_wsgi. i found it cost at least 60M memory per