On Nov 10, 2007 10:01 PM, ToddG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think (at least hope) that people in general are slighting the
> amount of effort that goes into a release -- a big recurring theme
> seems to be though that what you keep graciously going to great
> lengths to repeat here isn't
On Nov 9, 6:41 am, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> then. It's very time consuming to go around again on this topic (in
> fact, it will slow down the next release, and I gather people in this
> thread want that as soon as possible).
I don't think (at least hope) that people in
On 11-Nov-07, at 5:15 AM, James Bennett wrote:
>> Is this going to coincide with the release of the django book, by any
>> chance? ;)
>
> The book is not, never has been and never will be tied in any way to
> the timing of a 1.0 release. The book's schedule has always been
> independent of
On Nov 10, 2007 8:36 AM, David Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this going to coincide with the release of the django book, by any
> chance? ;)
The book is not, never has been and never will be tied in any way to
the timing of a 1.0 release. The book's schedule has always been
On 9 Nov 2007, at 1:58 am, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 21:17 +, kahless wrote:
> [...]
>> So are there any plans on releasing a 0.97 ?
>
> The next release will almost certainly be written as "1.0".
Is this going to coincide with the release of the django book, by
On Nov 9, 12:41 pm, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> release, remain valid. It might sound harsh, but nothing's changed since
> then. It's very time consuming to go around again on this topic (in
> fact, it will slow down the next release, and I gather people in this
> thread want
Malcolm Tredinnick napisał(a):
> Finally, for everybody who feels that they really want to write
> something in this thread about why there should be a 0.97, please accept
> that (a) we are aiming for 1.0 and trying to read or intentionally
> misread motivations into that, such as claiming it
On Nov 9, 2007 11:07 AM, Jarek Zgoda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Malcolm Tredinnick napisał(a):
> The next release will almost certainly be written as "1.0".
>
> Bad news. We have a policy to use only published versions of libraries,
> so our way from 0.96.x to all sweet improvements like
Malcolm Tredinnick napisał(a):
>> So are there any plans on releasing a 0.97 ?
>
> The next release will almost certainly be written as "1.0".
Bad news. We have a policy to use only published versions of libraries,
so our way from 0.96.x to all sweet improvements like unicode will be
On Nov 9, 2:58 am, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> work towards 1.0. Trust me on this: the maintainers want to get it out
> the door as much as you do.
i'm sure they do .. but my "fear" (or .. guess) is that it might be
more important to be bug-free and stable for such a big
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 21:17 +, kahless wrote:
[...]
> So are there any plans on releasing a 0.97 ?
The next release will almost certainly be written as "1.0".
Making releases isn't a trivial thing. Along with the stabilisation
period prior to a release, there's the implicit "end-of-life"
> as far as i understand it, django applications are ment to be
> pluggable.. how big are the odds that you'll find two applications
> which would work with the same django trunk revision ?
I didn't mean that your app would stop working at all on any other
revisions. Just that you can
On Nov 8, 10:53 pm, RajeshD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand the concern, but how does having a 0.97 release change
> this for you? There would still be potentially backwards-incompatible
> changes moving forward from 0.97 to the next official release.
of course there will be
>
> So are there any plans on releasing a 0.97 ? I hope you understand my
> concerns - django is really great and the trunk is stable but
I understand the concern, but how does having a 0.97 release change
this for you? There would still be potentially backwards-incompatible
changes moving
Hi,
Sorry if these questions are getting boring since everyone wants to
know when the next release (and 1.0) is released .. but i haven't
found a answer by searching the forums...
After so many backward incompatible changes it would be really nice if
there would be a new django release. I want
15 matches
Mail list logo
