Re: Django deployment options

2007-09-19 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On 20-Sep-07, at 9:01 AM, Graham Dumpleton wrote: >> one caveat here - if you are running a site on shared hosting with >> soft RAM limit - like the 40 MB webfaction account, then it is wise >> to bypass mod_python for media to avoid those nasty monday morning >> mails about exceeding your

Re: Django deployment options

2007-09-19 Thread Graham Dumpleton
On Sep 20, 12:52 pm, Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 20-Sep-07, at 8:09 AM, Graham Dumpleton wrote: > > > All those warnings about using the same Apache to serve static > > documents as Django are generally totally meaningless to the average > > user. This is because the load on

Re: Django deployment options

2007-09-19 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On 20-Sep-07, at 8:09 AM, Graham Dumpleton wrote: > All those warnings about using the same Apache to serve static > documents as Django are generally totally meaningless to the average > user. This is because the load on an average Apache site is no where > near enough for it to be of concern.

Re: Django deployment options

2007-09-19 Thread Graham Dumpleton
On Sep 20, 10:28 am, Steve Potter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Django can be run fine under Apache 1.3 using mod_wsgi. > > > The only issue is whether they do really allow you to add additional > > Apache modules to the installation. > > > Graham > > This is interesting... It is possible to

Re: Django deployment options

2007-09-19 Thread Graham Dumpleton
On Sep 20, 12:16 pm, Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 20-Sep-07, at 12:23 AM, Steve Potter wrote: > > > I'm already quite sure I don't want to install mod_python on the > > existing Apache after reading all of the warnings about using the same > > Apache to serve static documents

Re: Django deployment options

2007-09-19 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On 20-Sep-07, at 12:23 AM, Steve Potter wrote: > I'm already quite sure I don't want to install mod_python on the > existing Apache after reading all of the warnings about using the same > Apache to serve static documents and Django. I am not sure exactly what you mean by this. mod_python is

Re: Django deployment options

2007-09-19 Thread Steve Potter
> > Django can be run fine under Apache 1.3 using mod_wsgi. > > The only issue is whether they do really allow you to add additional > Apache modules to the installation. > > Graham This is interesting... It is possible to install additional modules with cpanel, it just makes updating for new

Re: Django deployment options

2007-09-19 Thread Steve Potter
> > 5. Use a different server. > > Unless you are on what cPanel calls the bleeding edge, you're running > Apache 1.3 which is useless for serving Django. That leaves you with > either #3 or #4. #3 has issues because cPanel wants to bind Apache to > all IP addresses. I had issues (though I

Re: Django deployment options

2007-09-19 Thread Graham Dumpleton
On Sep 20, 8:03 am, "Peter Baumgartner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/19/07, Steve Potter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I currently have a dedicated server running a Cpanel installation with > > several virtual hosts. I would like to install Django on this server > > and as far as I can

Re: Django deployment options

2007-09-19 Thread Peter Baumgartner
On 9/19/07, Steve Potter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I currently have a dedicated server running a Cpanel installation with > several virtual hosts. I would like to install Django on this server > and as far as I can tell, I have several options. > > 1. Add mod_python to existing Apache

Django deployment options

2007-09-19 Thread Steve Potter
I currently have a dedicated server running a Cpanel installation with several virtual hosts. I would like to install Django on this server and as far as I can tell, I have several options. 1. Add mod_python to existing Apache installation 2. Add FastCGI to existing Apache installation 3.