Elizabeth Zwicky writes:
No, I mean to say that never stopped does not mean never slowed
down, it means never stopped.
OK. I'll remember that.
In any case, now I wonder what they're really trying to do. They can
check for p=reject without sending *any* mail. (I know, you're not
in a
On Jun 13, 2014, at 7:18 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull step...@xemacs.org wrote:
In any case, now I wonder what they're really trying to do. They can
check for p=reject without sending *any* mail.
That's not an integration test. It's all automated. The answer you want is,
Can I make money now?
John Sweet writes:
That's not an integration test. It's all automated. The answer you
want is, Can I make money now? This is how you get the
answer. The DMARC record is only part of the story, whether
recipients act on it or not is just as important.
Well, for Author Domains publishing
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net
wrote:
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Phillip Hallam-Baker writes:
My point is that mail is an old protocol and people who expect that
it can be kept going unaltered in its original form serving all the
On Jun 9, 2014, at 11:17 PM, Scott Kitterman skl...@kitterman.com wrote:
Perhaps I'm oversimplifying, but it has seemed self-evident that you need a
single identifier that is displayed to the end user and 5322.From is the only
identifier that even comes close to being the right one.
And
On 13 Jun 2014, at 7:55, Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote:
Just a quick reminder here: Postal mail is still going strong, after 100s of
years.
I don't know what it's like where you live, but here the only thing that is
keeping the post office afloat is being paid by
On Jun 13, 2014, at 5:02 PM, Joe Abley jab...@hopcount.ca wrote:
On 13 Jun 2014, at 7:55, Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote:
Just a quick reminder here: Postal mail is still going strong, after 100s
of years.
I don't know what it's like where you live, but here the only
