Terry Zink writes:
> Seeing as how there isn't any consensus on how MTAs should display
> things, Outlook's implementation of displaying multiple
> sender/from/reply-to fields is on-par with almost anyone else's.
That criterion ("no consensus") is like saying that since there's no
consensus o
>> Sender in its present incarnation is not particularly useful,
>> period.
> I don't disagree. I just think Outlook's display makes it worse than
> useless.
The Outlook client is used in many places - it hooks up with the Exchange MTA
but also with multiple other mail services like Yahoo Mail,
MH Michael Hammer (5304) writes:
> How does the recipient know that the NPO has permission? In fact,
> how does the recipient know that it is really the NPO if it is
> spoofing the existing donor's email address?
He doesn't, and he doesn't. That's my point: absent some form of
authentication,
Terry Zink writes:
> > And third (the killer) the recipients aren't going to recognize
> > the new address, and so it's going to look as suspicious as the
> > stupid Outlook-style headers.
>
> What's "stupid" about Outlook style headers? How should it look?
Technically, maybe nothing, in th
> And third (the killer) the
> recipients aren't going to recognize the new address, and so it's
> going to look as suspicious as the stupid Outlook-style headers.
What's "stupid" about Outlook style headers? How should it look?
-- Terry
-Original Message-
From: dmarc [mailto:dmarc-boun.
John Levine writes:
> > From: "John Doe (j...@dmarc-abuser.com) via NPO"
>
> I would try some tests particularly at AOL before I did that. AOL
> mail tends to reject anything that looks like a munged AOL address.
>
> The least painful approach may be to tell people with AOL addresses,
> From: "John Doe (j...@dmarc-abuser.com) via NPO"
I would try some tests particularly at AOL before I did that. AOL
mail tends to reject anything that looks like a munged AOL address.
The least painful approach may be to tell people with AOL addresses,
sorry, please get a different address.
On 3/9/2015 8:01 PM, Steve Atkins wrote:
But this seems contrary to information from OpenSPF:
http://www.openspf.org/Best_Practices/Webgenerated
The key component is to ensure that the SMTP "MAIL FROM" address is from your domain. After that,
adding "Sender:" or "Reply-To:" headers is good eti
Jason,
You can pattern your approach on what we at American Greetings do for
our card notifications. The non-profit should send as themselves
(without a sender field) and put something in the subject line that
indicates the individual who is making the request through the
non-profit. You can
