On Monday, August 29, 2022 12:27:11 PM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Monday, August 29, 2022 11:09:50 AM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Monday, August 29, 2022 10:59:55 AM EDT Todd Herr wrote:
> > > Version created from the pull request John mentioned on-list on August
> > > 28.
> >
> > Thank
Thanks,
Scott K
On August 30, 2022 9:02:05 PM UTC, "Brotman, Alex"
wrote:
>That would be me I should hope. I'll get that sorted out tonight or tomorrow.
>
>--
>Alex Brotman
>Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy
>Comcast
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: dmarc On Behalf Of Sco
That would be me I should hope. I'll get that sorted out tonight or tomorrow.
--
Alex Brotman
Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy
Comcast
> -Original Message-
> From: dmarc On Behalf Of Scott Kitterman
> Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2022 12:49 PM
> To: dmarc@ietf.org
> Subject: [dm
I noticed that
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dmarc/draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting is at
least one revision behind. Can whoever has the files for the
current revision update the repository?
Scott K
___
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://ww
On Tuesday, August 30, 2022 12:34:36 PM EDT Todd Herr wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 12:20 PM Scott Kitterman
>
> wrote:
> > While we're fixing typos, the last sentence in the rua definition in
> > Section 5.3
> > needs a period at the end.
>
> Fixed in git.
Thanks,
Scott K
__
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 12:20 PM Scott Kitterman
wrote:
>
> While we're fixing typos, the last sentence in the rua definition in
> Section 5.3
> needs a period at the end.
>
Fixed in git.
--
*Todd Herr * | Technical Director, Standards and Ecosystem
*e:* todd.h...@valimail.com
*m:* 703.220.41
On Tuesday, August 30, 2022 11:08:14 AM EDT Todd Herr wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 11:05 AM Scott Kitterman
>
> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 30, 2022 10:58:10 AM EDT Todd Herr wrote:
> > > No substantive differences between this version and version 17.
> > >
> > > Version 18 was created wit
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 11:05 AM Scott Kitterman
wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 30, 2022 10:58:10 AM EDT Todd Herr wrote:
> > No substantive differences between this version and version 17.
> >
> > Version 18 was created with the latest revs of the tools for converting
> > markdown documents to RFCs
On Tuesday, August 30, 2022 10:58:10 AM EDT Todd Herr wrote:
> No substantive differences between this version and version 17.
>
> Version 18 was created with the latest revs of the tools for converting
> markdown documents to RFCs (mmark and xml2rfc). Older revs of these tools
> were used to crea
No substantive differences between this version and version 17.
Version 18 was created with the latest revs of the tools for converting
markdown documents to RFCs (mmark and xml2rfc). Older revs of these tools
were used to create previous versions of DMARCbis, and so some intended
linked reference
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting
& Conformance WG of the IETF.
Title : Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and
Conformance (DMARC)
On August 30, 2022 2:25:11 PM UTC, Todd Herr
wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 10:10 PM John R. Levine wrote:
>
>> >> I took a look and it looks to me like all the section references are
>> >> there. Which ones are missing?
>> >
>> > According to the diff provided on the web site [1], quite a
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 10:10 PM John R. Levine wrote:
> >> I took a look and it looks to me like all the section references are
> >> there. Which ones are missing?
> >
> > According to the diff provided on the web site [1], quite a few in the
> > following hunks of the diff:
>
> The section num
Todd, your confusion makes me think we do need a four-valued identifier.
Any domain might be used to send mail, legitimately or fraudulently, and
may have a DMARC record. Therefore, an initial PSD=Y is always a
possibility.
Initial PSD=Y means that an organizational boundary exists below the
cur
14 matches
Mail list logo
