Alex -
Good catch... and yeah, if the DMARC-bis version won't be incremented, I agree
that the "version" field in the RUA should remain "1" for both RFC7489 and
DMARC-bis so there's no disconnect in meaning of "version".
What about adding a field that'd expressly identifies which DMARC record
While reviewing something in the aggregate doc, I came across this bit in the
XML specification. Unless I've missed something, we're not incrementing the
version in the DMARC DNS record.
So, if we're not changing that DNS record, obviously this "version" string has
less meaning. The
