Multiple DKIM signature reporting is reasonable. However there have been
report instances which overdid it, inserting multiple instances of the same
domain+result[+selector].
It's certainly possible to re-sign a message with the same domain+selector
and obtain the same verification result, but I d
On 07/07/2016 11:54, Elizabeth Zwicky wrote:
>
> Tomki [Camp] pointed out that I am completely wrong about selectors and
> lots of people report them. I should have checked.
And I didn't check - I do see provision for selectors in the aggregate
report XML in RFC7489.
Is the question of messages
Being able to identify the service that originated a piece of email is
extremely helpful in getting a domain to quarantine/reject.
Including all DKIM signatures found on a message (not just those that are
aligned or that pass) in the DMARC aggregate reports can be very helpful in
ascertaining that
Tomki pointed out that I am completely wrong about selectors and lots of people
report them. I should have checked.
Elizabeth
zwi...@otoh.org
> On Jul 7, 2016, at 11:38 AM, Steven M Jones wrote:
>
> I'm quoting the following response in a thread from the
> dmarc-disc...@dmarc.org mailing li
I'm quoting the following response in a thread from the
dmarc-disc...@dmarc.org mailing list, because I think it identifies work
items or at least questions this WG may want to address. If this is
already captured somewhere, my apologies.
Here's the original thread:
http://lists.dmarc.org/piperma
