Re: [dmarc-ietf] ABNF update to dmarc-psd

2021-06-08 Thread Tim Wicinski
Dave, I agree but was scrabbling with the wording. How about The "dmarc-record" definition is also updated to include the following: [dmarc-sep dmarc-nprequest] which will go in the next to last line of the definition, as so: [dmarc-sep dmarc-percent] [dmarc-sep

Re: [dmarc-ietf] ABNF update to dmarc-psd

2021-06-07 Thread Dave Crocker
On 6/7/2021 3:10 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:      dmarc-nprequest =  "np" *WSP "=" *WSP          ( "none" / "quarantine" / "reject" ) I suggest adding a comment that makes the linkage of 'nprequest' to the prose text explicit. d/ -- Dave Crocker dcroc...@gmail.com 408.329.0791 Volunteer,

[dmarc-ietf] ABNF update to dmarc-psd

2021-06-07 Thread Tim Wicinski
All When I raised the point for dmarc-bis making sure that new tags define their ABNF, I realized that the PSD document does no such thing. It does describe the definition, as it's the same as the "sp" tag. I added the following section to dmarc-psd updating 7489 as such: 3.3. Changes in