Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #4 (Definition of "fo" parameter) - With Interim Notes

2021-06-17 Thread Todd Herr
I have closed the subject ticket and incorporated relevant text changes in draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-02, which will be published on Datatracker as soon as the chairs have a chance to do so. On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 8:29 PM Steven M Jones wrote: > On 5/28/21 08:43, Todd Herr wrote: > > >

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #4 (Definition of "fo" parameter) - With Interim Notes

2021-05-28 Thread Steven M Jones
On 5/28/21 08:43, Todd Herr wrote: > > Consensus on Ticket #4 > (Definition of "fo" > parameter) was reached during the May 27 DMARC Interim to update the > definition of the "fo" parameter with the following sentence, as shown > in dmarcbis-01: > >

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #4 (Definition of "fo" parameter) - With Interim Notes

2021-05-28 Thread Dotzero
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 1:41 PM John Levine wrote: > It appears that Alessandro Vesely said: > >On Fri 28/May/2021 17:43:09 +0200 Todd Herr wrote: > >> The value of this tag is either "0", "1", or a colon-separated list > of the > >> options represented by alphabetic characters. > > >

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #4 (Definition of "fo" parameter) - With Interim Notes

2021-05-28 Thread John Levine
It appears that Alessandro Vesely said: >On Fri 28/May/2021 17:43:09 +0200 Todd Herr wrote: >> The value of this tag is either "0", "1", or a colon-separated list of >> the >> options represented by alphabetic characters. > >Works for me. Yes. R's, John

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #4 (Definition of "fo" parameter) - With Interim Notes

2021-05-28 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On Fri 28/May/2021 17:43:09 +0200 Todd Herr wrote: The value of this tag is either "0", "1", or a colon-separated list of the options represented by alphabetic characters. Works for me. Ale -- ___ dmarc mailing list

[dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #4 (Definition of "fo" parameter) - With Interim Notes

2021-05-28 Thread Todd Herr
Greetings. Consensus on Ticket #4 (Definition of "fo" parameter) was reached during the May 27 DMARC Interim to update the definition of the "fo" parameter with the following sentence, as shown in dmarcbis-01: The value of this tag is either "0", "1",