Re: [dmarc-ietf] Discussion - ARC/Extensible Reporting (Ticket #56)

2021-01-25 Thread Brotman, Alex
r 30, 2020 4:49 PM To: Emil Gustafsson Cc: Marc Bradshaw ; DMARC IETF Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Discussion - ARC/Extensible Reporting (Ticket #56) We’ve already mentioned ARC. Could it also be extended to allow for Domain Reputation reporting back to the sender? Instead of a central access point,

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Discussion - ARC/Extensible Reporting (Ticket #56)

2020-12-30 Thread Brotman, Alex
& Messaging Policy Comcast From: Emil Gustafsson Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2020 2:49 PM To: Brotman, Alex Cc: Marc Bradshaw ; DMARC IETF Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Discussion - ARC/Extensible Reporting (Ticket #56) While the common format would be great as a consumer of reports, I'm wonde

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Discussion - ARC/Extensible Reporting (Ticket #56)

2020-12-24 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On Mon 07/Dec/2020 23:17:16 +0100 Marc Bradshaw wrote: There is value in including these in one report, especially where the extended property being reported on influences how DMARC is evaluated. I think I represent a meagre minority of people who reads individual DMARC reports. Most other

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Discussion - ARC/Extensible Reporting (Ticket #56)

2020-12-08 Thread Brotman, Alex
systems break down. -- Alex Brotman Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy Comcast From: dmarc On Behalf Of Marc Bradshaw Sent: Monday, December 7, 2020 5:17 PM To: DMARC IETF Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Discussion - ARC/Extensible Reporting (Ticket #56) There is value in including t

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Discussion - ARC/Extensible Reporting (Ticket #56)

2020-12-07 Thread Marc Bradshaw
Vesely wrote: > On Thu 03/Dec/2020 19:54:51 +0100 Brotman, Alex wrote: > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: dmarc On Behalf Of Alessandro Vesely > >> Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2020 6:24 AM > >> To: dmarc@ietf.org > >> Subject:

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Discussion - ARC/Extensible Reporting (Ticket #56)

2020-12-03 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On Thu 03/Dec/2020 19:54:51 +0100 Brotman, Alex wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: dmarc On Behalf Of Alessandro Vesely >> Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2020 6:24 AM >> To: dmarc@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Discussion - ARC/Extensible Repor

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Discussion - ARC/Extensible Reporting (Ticket #56)

2020-12-03 Thread Brotman, Alex
> -Original Message- > From: dmarc On Behalf Of Alessandro Vesely > Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2020 6:24 AM > To: dmarc@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Discussion - ARC/Extensible Reporting (Ticket #56) > > On Wed 02/Dec/2020 20:46:54 +0100 Brotman, Alex wrot

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Discussion - ARC/Extensible Reporting (Ticket #56)

2020-12-03 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On Wed 02/Dec/2020 20:46:54 +0100 Brotman, Alex wrote: While this ticket/enhancement specifically mentions ARC, I could perhaps see the usefulness in other places. It seems like it would be more beneficial to create a method by which other documents could provide XML- based "extensions" to th

[dmarc-ietf] Discussion - ARC/Extensible Reporting (Ticket #56)

2020-12-02 Thread Brotman, Alex
Folks, While this ticket/enhancement specifically mentions ARC, I could perhaps see the usefulness in other places. It seems like it would be more beneficial to create a method by which other documents could provide XML- based "extensions" to the report. This would allow mechanisms relying on