Authenticated Identifiers...
-Original Message-
From: dmarc [mailto:dmarc-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Franck Martin
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 7:50 PM
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dmarc-
interoperability-02.txt
FYI
I think overall, there are two concerns I have:
1) The over estimated use of the idea for rewriting and
2) the word or term common is used for mitigation methods.
Common means most and its not the case. Rewriting is a major industry
taboo, in all mail or communications concept. Just because
- Original Message -
From: Hector Santos hsan...@isdg.net
To: Franck Martin fra...@peachymango.org, dmarc@ietf.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 11:26:06 AM
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] New Version Notification for
draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-02.txt
I think overall
- Original Message -
From: MH Michael Hammer (5304) mham...@ag.com
To: Franck Martin fra...@peachymango.org, dmarc@ietf.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 12:47:20 PM
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] New Version Notification for
draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-02.txt
2. Causes
Yes, they are not downgraded in transit. I improved the solution section
in receivers, but I realize the description of the problem is not
accurate. Fixing (and see below).
Really, there is no problem. DMARC works fine on EAI mail. Just delete
the section.
I don't see anywhere in RFC6854
No. No, no no. The dowmgrade is only for POP/IMAP retrieval to non-EAI
clients, not anything else. If it's forwarded by sieve or the like, it'll
forward the original EAI message.
When I click the forward button there is no MTA involved... It will not
forward the original EAI message.
- Original Message -
From: John R Levine jo...@taugh.com
To: Franck Martin fra...@peachymango.org
Cc: dmarc@ietf.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 5:12:21 PM
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] New Version Notification for
draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-02.txt
No. No, no, no. No, no, it is not. No, no, it is not, any email client can forward the
message they downloaded via POP/IMAP. They have no idea about the original EAI
message
smashing the message, because MS-Exchange/MS-Outlook prefers MS-TNEF to MIME,
is a different problem.
Please, don't
Hector Santos writes:
Common means most and its not the case.
You're wrong. Common in this context means frequently observed.
Most common means most frequently observed.
That said, with no statistics about actual usage, I would omit this
word.
Rewriting is a major industry taboo, in all
FYI
Please post more reviews...
-
A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-02.txt
has been successfully submitted by Franck Martin and posted to the
IETF repository.
Name: draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability
Revision: 02
Title: Interoperability Issues Between
10 matches
Mail list logo
