Re: [dmarc-ietf] The DMARC WG has placed draft-crocker-dmarc-sender in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2020-08-13 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On 2020-08-13 1:59 a.m., John Levine wrote: In article <01d670ee$e38f8750$aaae95f0$@bayviewphysicians.com> you write: The author fails to recognize that we have a single-author email architecture. Consequently, the last entity to alter the message IS the author. Sorry, but no. The

Re: [dmarc-ietf] The DMARC WG has placed draft-crocker-dmarc-sender in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2020-08-12 Thread John Levine
In article <01d670ee$e38f8750$aaae95f0$@bayviewphysicians.com> you write: >The author fails to recognize that we have a single-author email >architecture. Consequently, the last entity to alter the message IS the >author. Sorry, but no. The structure of Internet mail is quite clear, and

Re: [dmarc-ietf] The DMARC WG has placed draft-crocker-dmarc-sender in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2020-08-12 Thread Doug Foster
-1 A vote against the proposal in the strongest possible terms. About the Analysis: Quote Internet mail defines the RFC5322.From field to indicate the author of the message's content and the RFC5322.Sender field to indicate who initially handled the message... This was not a problem, until

[dmarc-ietf] The DMARC WG has placed draft-crocker-dmarc-sender in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2020-08-10 Thread IETF Secretariat
The DMARC WG has placed draft-crocker-dmarc-sender in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Tim Wicinski) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-crocker-dmarc-sender/ ___ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org