his point?
--
Alex Brotman
Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse
Comcast
-Original Message-
From: dmarc [mailto:dmarc-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Barry Leiba
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 5:27 PM
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-16
So begins Working Group
It's been quite a while since my last full read-through of the spec, so
apologies if I blunder into anything long-settled. And apologies if I'm
repeating something from earlier commentary, I'm trying to get in under
a very liberal interpretation of the deadline as is... ;)
Love the way
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 8:53 AM, A. Schulze wrote:
> - section-2.1 introduce "AMDM" defined later in section-3
>
Great catch. Based on Dave Crocker's feedback, we've defined the term
"Authentication Assessment" and moved the entire second paragraph of 2.1
into this definition, which ends up
Hello WG,
Seth pushed me to really /read/ the whole draft, thanks!
I noted the following points that may or may not be so important...
- section-2.1 introduce "AMDM" defined later in section-3
- I read https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-16
in section-3, the links point
