On 2020-05-19 00:09, Douglas E. Foster wrote:
I understand your question to be "Why do I see invalid DKIM signatures
on messages from the IETF mailing list?"
yes this is my consern, it should not be breaked on take ownerships, if
maillist can break dkim and take ownerships and still not make i
On Mon 18/May/2020 22:32:21 +0200 John Levine wrote:
> In article you write:
>>> I suggested they make a few changes which they have now done: there is
>>> now an explicit _dmarc.dmarc.ietf.org TXT record, and there is an MX
>>> record pointing at the mail server rather than A/ records.
>>
>>s
In article <0127a137400d466095373373ec887...@bayviewphysicians.com> you write:
>This example is a reminder that every message is a take-it-or-leave-it
>proposition. You can accept
>the message or reject it, based on the message characteristics, but you will
>probably be unable to
>cannot change
sms.
Hope this helps,
Doug Foster
From: me=40junc...@dmarc.ietf.org
Sent: 5/16/20 7:58 AM
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc.ietf.org failed dmarc
https://dmarcian.com/domain-checker/ test it there
if not taking ownerships it will get dmarc pass
oh w
On 2020-05-18 22:32, John Levine wrote:
spamassassin still says dkim invalid here
Yes, that is correct. I would suggest learning more about DMARC and
why
that is not a problem.
i will when spamassassin supports dmarc
___
dmarc mailing list
dmar
In article you write:
>> I suggested they make a few changes which they have now done: there is
>> now an explicit _dmarc.dmarc.ietf.org TXT record, and there is an MX
>> record pointing at the mail server rather than A/ records.
>
>spamassassin still says dkim invalid here
Yes, that is corre
On 2020-05-18 22:02, Tim Wicinski wrote:
+1 John and thanks.
this mail is dkim valid au here, hope to see posts from John that is
pass aswell
___
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
+1 John and thanks.
tim
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 3:51 PM John R. Levine wrote:
> While the setup for dmarc.ietf.org was correct before, it was pretty
> funky.
>
> I suggested they make a few changes which they have now done:
> there is now an explicit _dmarc.dmarc.ietf.org TXT record, and there
On 2020-05-18 21:51, John R. Levine wrote:
While the setup for dmarc.ietf.org was correct before, it was pretty
funky.
+1
I suggested they make a few changes which they have now done: there is
now an explicit _dmarc.dmarc.ietf.org TXT record, and there is an MX
record pointing at the mail ser
While the setup for dmarc.ietf.org was correct before, it was pretty
funky.
I suggested they make a few changes which they have now done:
there is now an explicit _dmarc.dmarc.ietf.org TXT record, and there is an
MX record pointing at the mail server rather than A/ records.
Regards,
John
https://dmarcian.com/domain-checker/ test it there
if not taking ownerships it will get dmarc pass
oh well software testers needs cases to test on its one here then
if its complete impossible to not break dkim i will leave this maillist
___
dmarc mai
11 matches
Mail list logo
