Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Request] Presentation in IETF101

I want to thank Yasutaka san for presenting the Virtual DMARC proposal. I believe the situation he and his colleagues are addressing would benefit from more attention. The meeting materials at IETF do not seem to include Yasutaka san's slides. If I didn't just miss it, would it be possible to

Re: [dmarc-ietf] OT: Yet another addition to dmarc-rfc7601bis-00

On Sun 18/Mar/2018 13:43:56 +0100 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:25 AM, Alessandro Vesely > wrote: > > Would it be possible to insert a dnswl method in the new spec? > [...] > > > I'd prefer to do this as its own

Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Request] Presentation in IETF101

Hi Steven, Thank you for your comment. You can download from the following link. https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/agenda.html - Virtual DMARC: DMARC verification without record definitions I will send you directly just in case. Regards, Genki --- Genki YASUTAKA Rakuten, Inc. Mail:

Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Request] Presentation in IETF101

On 3/19/18 2:02 PM, Yasutaka, Genki | Dkim | OPS wrote: > > > You can download from the following link. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/agenda.html > > - Virtual DMARC: DMARC verification without record definitions > > I will send you directly just in case. > Thank you, I found it -- I

Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Request] Presentation in IETF101

Since SPF "Best Guess" is mentioned ... This was developed very, very early in the SPF project to help bootstrap the protocol when not very many domains published records. When the original SPF RFC, RFC 4408, was developed, it was considered for standardization and the judgment of the

Re: [dmarc-ietf] OT: Yet another addition to dmarc-rfc7601bis-00

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 5:29 PM, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > On Sun 18/Mar/2018 13:43:56 +0100 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:25 AM, Alessandro Vesely > > wrote: > > > > Would it be possible to insert a dnswl