On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 3:32 PM, Brandon Long wrote:
> Hmm, I guess this means the set of required/optional fields now stretches
> between the DKIM and ARC specs, eh?
>
> Is t the only one that's now optional?
>
> For Seal, I have i, a, s, d, b, cv (removed t based on this
Hmm, I guess this means the set of required/optional fields now stretches
between the DKIM and ARC specs, eh?
Is t the only one that's now optional?
For Seal, I have i, a, s, d, b, cv (removed t based on this thread)
For AMS, I have i, a, s, c, d, d, b, h, bh
Brandon
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at
On 21/03/18 15:18, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 3:00 PM, wrote:
>
>> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-13.txt
>> has been successfully submitted by Kurt Andersen and posted to the
>> IETF repository.
I see that Google are still
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 3:00 PM, wrote:
> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-13.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Kurt Andersen and posted to the
> IETF repository.
>
> Name: draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol
> Revision: 13
> Title: