A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss skrev den 2017-01-30 22:30:
Am 30.01.2017 um 21:40 schrieb SheridanJ West via dmarc-discuss:
I encountered a opendmarc bug that required adsp records
don't waste your time with ADSP, forget it.
it's deprecated and in fact dead
and spamassaasin does not care of
spf test does not use from header, spf is not sender-id
___
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms
On 2016-10-04 19:41, Elizabeth Zwicky wrote:
The DMARC on the mailing list passes when it reaches me -- it appears
that something in the path between you and dmarc.org is the problem
with breaking the DKIM signature.
correct, did i get a problem on postfix maillist ?
Since it's dmarc.org's
On 2016-10-04 17:20, Franck Martin wrote:
I'm not sure what is the issue here? Mailing lists break DKIM by
design.
bad designed on thiese maillist then its not dkim/dmarc fails
post on postfix maillist have never breaked dkim for me
We could go to the old style of mailing lists, which did
Authentication-Results: linode.junc.eu; dmarc=pass header.from=dmarc.org
Authentication-Results: linode.junc.eu;
dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=dmarc.org
header.i=@dmarc.org header.b=g7uNA2zS;
dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; secure)
On 2016-10-04 16:06, Lynne Mack via dmarc-discuss wrote:
HOW I DO GET OFF THIS LIST
how to read the list ?
http://lists.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss, helpfull in the
box unsubscribe or edit options
i just wonder how you subscribed
On 16. jan. 2015 10.23.10 Constantino Antunes via dmarc-discuss
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org wrote
Since yesterday I made the following changes:
- changed the rua address: the previous one was receiving e-mail, but
nevertheless
- found an old SPF rule which was too permissive: did a complete rewrite
On October 20, 2014 9:00:55 PM Murray Kucherawy m...@fb.com wrote:
I¹m pretty sure the entire population of this mailing list didn¹t need to
know that; an email to me would¹ve been sufficient.
Abuse or postmaster ?, well i see more domains with this problem, nearly
enough to fix lokal not
The mail system
repo...@dmarc.org: host dragon.trusteddomain.org[208.69.40.156] said: 550
5.1.1 repo...@dmarc.org... User unknown (in reply to RCPT TO command)
___
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
On October 6, 2014 8:48:35 PM Scott Kitterman via dmarc-discuss
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org wrote:
Postfix removes it.
Thanks Scott for topposting :)
I get Received:, but why would Content-Length change in-flight?
Is this BodyLengthDB in opendkim.conf ?
Is yahoo using opendkim as is btw ?
On October 6, 2014 10:19:15 PM Murray Kucherawy via dmarc-discuss
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org wrote:
I get Received:, but why would Content-Length change in-flight?
Is this BodyLengthDB in opendkim.conf ?
No, they¹re unrelated.
Good
___
dmarc-discuss
On August 17, 2014 8:44:33 PM Andreas Schulze via dmarc-discuss
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org wrote:
I noticed the second time spam directed to the address
I use to use only for sending dmarc reports. It's not the address public
availabe as part of
my dmarc record but my decicated sender address
On 1. aug. 2014 10.46.08 CEST, Anders Wegge Keller via dmarc-discuss
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org wrote:
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: domain of geowiki-ad...@wegge.dk designates \
5.9.72.151 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=geowiki-ad...@wegge.dk;
spf uses
Authentication-Results: duggi.junc.org/3211C25C056; dmarc=pass
header.from=linkedin.com
wow, where is the footer now ? :)
--
Sendt fra min Android telefon med K-9 Mail. Undskyld hvis jeg er lidt
kortfattet.___
dmarc-discuss mailing list
Authentication-Results: duggi.junc.org/5CA2025C056; dmarc=none
header.from=dmarc.org
not solved yet
have nice weekend, the ismann delivered iscream here :)
--
Sendt fra min Android telefon med K-9 Mail. Undskyld hvis jeg er lidt
kortfattet.___
On 1. aug. 2014 19.34.41 CEST, Franck Martin via dmarc-discuss
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org wrote:
Because your client decided to show you the email I sent you directly
rather than the one via this mailing list…
the above was from maillist
Authentication-Results: duggi.junc.org/37CBA25C056;
On 1. aug. 2014 21.29.31 CEST, Franck Martin via dmarc-discuss
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org wrote:
Aim to the opendmarc mailing list if you have questions, but I though I
would alert people of this
updated from 1.2.0 to 1.3.0 here, seems to work, gentoo overlay fidonet, use it
at own risk
--
if all is well, i just waiting on the rain to fall
--
Sendt fra min Android telefon med K-9 Mail. Undskyld hvis jeg er lidt
kortfattet.___
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE:
On 19. jun. 2014 17.04.49 CEST, John Levine via dmarc-discuss
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org wrote:
So more specifically, the workaround for DMARC breaks S/MIME. Sigh.
yes, amavisd-new and postfix maillist let my dmarc get pass on my own domain,
silly to see that dmarc maillists try to make non
19 matches
Mail list logo
