On 1. aug. 2014 10.46.08 CEST, Anders Wegge Keller via dmarc-discuss <[email protected]> wrote:
> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; > spf=pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates \ >5.9.72.151 as permitted sender) [email protected]; spf uses envelope sender not from header, sender-id does use from header and it fails, now microsoft admit there faults :) sender-id is not part of spf > dkim=pass [email protected] dkim uses from header with is signed so it can be checked in dmarc if both spf and dkim is trusted > Also, I fail to see how mailing lists could work otherwise, as they >routinely change several of the signed header fields. post on postfix maillist and see your own dmarc pass everytime, if others maillists cant do that its not your fault -- Sendt fra min Android telefon med K-9 Mail. Undskyld hvis jeg er lidt kortfattet. _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
