Whoah there!
This thread has been hijacked by the lack of reading comprehension. Nobody (in
this thread) has complained of DMARC reports being too large.
The problem in this thread is an issue with some DMARC report senders failing
to parse the DMARC URIs properly, if that DMARC URI includes
On Aug 24, 2014, at 5:18 AM, Nicolás via dmarc-discuss
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org wrote:
Hi!
I'm new to DMARC, I configured it just a bunch of days ago, and even that I
think it's a great idea, I'm worried about its limitations over mailing
lists. I've read the FAQ about this, and I'm not
On Aug 24, 2014, at 3:07 PM, Larry Finch via dmarc-discuss
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org wrote:
On Aug 24, 2014, at 4:05 PM, Matt Simerson via dmarc-discuss
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org wrote:
On lists you don't manage, there is little you can do besides pester the
list operator and ask them
On Aug 24, 2014, at 4:29 PM, Dave Crocker d...@dcrocker.net wrote:
On 8/24/2014 4:20 PM, Matt Simerson via dmarc-discuss wrote:
DMARC only blocks phish *from* domains that publish strong DMARC
policies to receivers that validate and enforce those strong
policies.
That statement
On May 10, 2014, at 4:48 PM, Al Iverson via dmarc-discuss
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org wrote:
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Dave Crocker d...@dcrocker.net wrote:
On 5/9/2014 7:10 PM, Al Iverson via dmarc-discuss wrote:
This feels like complaining for complaining's sake.
You think that it's
