Thank you everybody for your fast and clear answers.
I've understood why I should wait for dkim while reading the reports...
Carlos Pantelides
@dev4sec
seguridad-agile.blogspot.com
El Miércoles, 12 de agosto, 2015 15:34:00, Tim Draegen t...@eudaemon.net
escribió:
Hi Carlos, it might
DKIM fails for 0.5% of cases when it should not fail, cause the protocol
is really complex and until DMARC such bugs were hard to find...
SPF is an easy protocol, not many bugs... however does not work with DMARC
when forwarding emails (the aligned part that is).
So for p=none you don't need to
Hi Carlos, it might help to flip the perspective around to receivers.
Receivers are looking for any positive signal that a piece of email can be
connected to a domain. If that signal is due to SPF, great. If that signal is
due to DKIM, that's great too. If both SPF and DKIM provide signals,
Hi there Carlos -
The main reason people say you should have both is that many customers do
things completely legitimately (like mail forwarding) that break SPF. Any
of those messages that lack DKIM will automatically fail DMARC, and
customers will wonder what the heck happened to their mail,
[mailto:dmarc-discuss-boun...@dmarc.org] On Behalf Of
Carlos P via dmarc-discuss
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 10:47 AM
To: dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
Subject: [dmarc-discuss] [Newbie warning] Both spf and dkim?
Hello,
I am new to DMARC and have a question: It is necesary to setup both SPF and
DKIM
