Jim Garrison wrote (after John Levine wrote):
>> When you looked at your outgoing mail logs for mail you sent yesterday
>> to MTAs in the IP range 209.17.112.0/21, which is one of web.com's
>> hosting farms, what did you find?
>
> My mail logs show no outgoing connections to any IP address in
>
On 2016-12-24 12:15 PM, Jim Garrison via dmarc-discuss wrote:
> How did the DKIM signature 'pass'? What does the disposition=none
> mean? Did Google not reject the email?
Sounds to me like you may have the wrong idea of DMARC's mechanics. Only one of
DKIM and SPF has to pass for DMARC to pass.
spf test does not use from header, spf is not sender-id
___
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms
I have DKIM and SPF configured, and set in my DMARC record for strict
enforcement and policy=reject:
v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; fo=1; ri=3600; ...
Today I received the following DMARC report from Google
google.com
noreply-dmarc-supp...@google.com
