...@andreasschulze.de
Emne: Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC where mail is never sent
>> Does it make sense to publish a DMARC record to signal that a host
>> should never send email? Can said record be published without an
>> accompanying DKIM record?
>
>See
>http://www.m3aawg.org/doc
this parked domain.
>
>
>
> --Terry
>
>
>
> *From:* dmarc-discuss [mailto:dmarc-discuss-boun...@dmarc.org] *On Behalf
> Of *Paul Rock via dmarc-discuss
> *Sent:* Friday, September 30, 2016 7:22 AM
> *To:* mi...@basejp.com
> *Cc:* dmarc-discuss <dmarc-discuss@
s this parked domain.
--Terry
From: dmarc-discuss [mailto:dmarc-discuss-boun...@dmarc.org] On Behalf Of Paul
Rock via dmarc-discuss
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 7:22 AM
To: mi...@basejp.com
Cc: dmarc-discuss <dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC where mail is never s
>> Does it make sense to publish a DMARC record to signal that a host
>> should never send email? Can said record be published without an
>> accompanying DKIM record?
>
>See
>http://www.m3aawg.org/documents/en/m3aawg-protecting-parked-domains-best-common-practices
Quite right. While you're at
Mitchell Kuch via dmarc-discuss:
Does it make sense to publish a DMARC record to signal that a host
should never send email? Can said record be published without an
accompanying DKIM record?
See
http://www.m3aawg.org/documents/en/m3aawg-protecting-parked-domains-best-common-practices
Yes, mainly for brand/domain protection. We see spammers co-opt domains all
the time that are widely recognized but not normally used for mail. I've
told people in the past to do this for domains that they own that should
never send mail, especially lookalike or spoof domains that you own for
