Sorry to get into this conversation.
My understanding was that RFC 4285 was developed for use in WiMAX and WiMAX
did have MIPv6 in its plans and this type of security fitted WiMAX very
well.
Behcet
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:17 AM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) <
sgund...@cisco.com> wrote:
> Hi Hesh
Thanks Sri,
Do you implement error code 144? Has there been any issues with your RFC
implementation (if you have an implementation of course)?
Hesham
-Original Message-
From: "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)"
Date: Monday, 28 January 2013 7:17 PM
To: Hesham Soliman , "dmm@ietf.org"
Hi Dirk,
I agree. It will take some efforts to do the content merge.
Regards
Sri
On 1/14/13 6:12 AM, "dirk.von-h...@telekom.de"
wrote:
>Hi Sri and all,
>Although it's too late (sorry for that) I agree with you and others who
>commented similarly that it's impossible (for me) to judge - both
>
Hi Hesham,
Yes. We do have implementations and field deployments based on 4285. Its
supported on number of platforms supporting mobile routers/home agent and
also a variant used between MAG and LMA.
Regards
Sri
On 1/23/13 5:53 AM, "Hesham Soliman" wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I was discussing this wi
