Hello Uma
I would like to remind you that TEAS WG is working on IETF slicing.
Have you looked into IETF Network Slice Application in 5G End-to-End Network
Slice,
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-gcdrb-teas-5g-network-slice-application-00
Is draft-ietf-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-04.txt
Hello Jeffery and John
Related to what you said “For “optimized signaling” it implies a new interface
that is composed of a minimum of (N2 + N4) interface (new interaction model at
SMF <> ANUP, and new interface)”
How would you see need and role for I-SMF? It would need PSA UPF wouldn’t
Hello Satoru
Thank you for the draft. I get confused with the various routing instances and
in which node they are running. I guess the missing chapter 7 would have
clarified this.
But between which nodes in your example you run BPG? Is the figure 1 correct by
indicating that that gNBs are in
Hello
I raised the same concern in the last meeting as Joel now in his mail. The
authors then told that the work is aligned with TEAS. But it seems not to be
clear after all.
It would help to start the alignment by adding a refer to TEAS slicing drafts.
And the use it in the text...
Best
Hello Miya and other authors of the draft
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-kohno-dmm-srv6mob-arch-00.txt
Your draft notes that SRv6 mobile user plane has been proposed as an
alternative way to complement or replace GTP-U both in IETF
[I-D.ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane] and 3GPP [TR.29892]. All the
Hello
Draft-ietf-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-03.txt says that "This work is corresponding
to the User Plane Protocol Study work on 3GPP side."
In order to appreciate that intent and to keep 3GPP and DMM views somehow
aligned, I would suggest that in this document and preferably also in
Hello all
Here are my promised review comments to SRv6-mobile-uplane draft.
Best regards
Hannu
---
Abstract
"This document describes the SRv6 mobile user plane behavior and defines the
SID functions for that.
It also provides a mechanism for end-to-end network
Hello Sri and others
I have reservations for the adaption of this document to WG draft.
It is not clear how what is the relevance of this draft to IETF lesser to the
3GPP. To what IETF or DMM WG documents this work would contribute? For example
if you look at section 1.2 "Our Way of Analysis
Hello
The draft SRv6-mobile-userplane seems to use the term "anchor" or "anchoring"
quite a lot, but what exactly is meant is much unclear. It looks to me that the
meaning changes during the progression of the text, or depends on the context.
As it appears to be such key term of the draft I
