sted, that can be used
in the placeholder. It would be easier to use them.
Thanks,
Mingui
> -Original Message-
> From: pierrick.se...@orange.com [mailto:pierrick.se...@orange.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 5:02 PM
> To: Mingui Zhang; dirk.von-h...@telekom.de;
Hi,
I am not alone who find Figure 1 is misleading. Lots of people around know
'DSL+LTE' is a peculiar use case of BBF WT-348. Now that the draft intends to
provide a generic protocol extension for mobility management systems, please
drop that use case.
Looking at the structure of the doc,
> > > multihomed MAG
> > >
> > > No, the extension is for the RG, i.e. Residential Gateway which is a
> > > broadband or fixed network element.
> > >
> > >
> > > > to register more than one PCoA
> > > > to the LMA. It is definitely usef
Hi,
I remember it was suggested to remove DSL, “Hybrid Access”, etc, and the
suggestion was acknowledged. We haven’t seen an updated version yet. It is not
ready to be adopted, I think.
I have read the draft. I found the scope greatly shrinked from the 01 to 02. I
guess the draft wants to
