Hi, I remember it was suggested to remove DSL, “Hybrid Access”, etc, and the suggestion was acknowledged. We haven’t seen an updated version yet. It is not ready to be adopted, I think.
I have read the draft. I found the scope greatly shrinked from the 01 to 02. I guess the draft wants to fight through by providing a more generic protocol extension, while awaiting for real use cases. And, Hybrid Access could be treated as a potential use case (Actually, the DSL+LTE scenario is now intentionally inherited from the 00 version as a use case.). If I guess right, I don’t think it’s a good starting point since it only covers a fragment of a possible solution. Besides the care of addresses, there are many other gaps that have not been touched: per-packet traffic classification and recombination, performance measurement, the bypass requirement, etc. From the draft, we cannot figure out a clear architectural overview. Section 3 doesn’t help much. Hence, I oppose its adoption. Thanks, Mingui From: dmm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dapeng Liu Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 12:22 AM To: dmm Subject: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02 Hello all, In IETF94, we initiated the call for adoption for the draft: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02>: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02 Seems have got sufficient support during the meeting. We'd like to confirm the call for adoption in the mailing list for 2 weeks. Please send your opinion and comments to the list before December 9. Thanks, ------ Best Regards, Dapeng&Jouni -- ------ Best Regards, Dapeng Liu
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
