...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday,
June 03, 2015 8:36 AM To: Templin, Fred L; Satoru
Matsushima Cc: dmm Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04
- /62s to UE, not /64s
Le 29/05/2015 20:21, Templin, Fred L a écrit :
Hi Alex,
-Original Message- From: dmm
[mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexandru
Message-
From: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:alexandru.petre...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 8:36 AM
To: Templin, Fred L; Satoru Matsushima
Cc: dmm
Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not /64s
Le 29/05/2015 20:21, Templin, Fred L a écrit :
Hi Alex,
-Original Message
Hi Alex,
-Original Message-
From: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:alexandru.petre...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 8:53 AM
To: Templin, Fred L; Tony Hain; 'Jouni Korhonen'; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not /64s
Hi Fred,
Le 12/06/2015 17
[mailto:alexandru.petre...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday,
June 03, 2015 8:36 AM To: Templin, Fred L; Satoru
Matsushima Cc: dmm Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04
- /62s to UE, not /64s
Le 29/05/2015 20:21, Templin, Fred L a écrit :
Hi Alex,
-Original Message- From: dmm
[mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org
: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not /64s
Le 29/05/2015 20:21, Templin, Fred L a écrit :
Hi Alex,
-Original Message-
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexandru
Petrescu
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 10:59 AM
To: Satoru Matsushima
Cc: dmm
Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc
: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 8:36 AM
To: Templin, Fred L; Satoru Matsushima
Cc: dmm
Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not /64s
Le 29/05/2015 20:21, Templin, Fred L a écrit :
Hi Alex,
-Original Message-
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexandru
Responding to two in one:
-Original Message-
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tony Hain
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 9:47 AM
To: 'Alexandru Petrescu'; 'Jouni Korhonen'; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not /64s
Alexandru
For lack of a better description, the cellular side of businesses suffer
from bell head: thinking, where the UE is an application endpoint.
Nothing more occurs to them, because that is the product they have always
supported. A routing function implies higher aggregate data rates than they
have
Fred,
Le 08/06/2015 19:08, Templin, Fred L a écrit :
[...]
The common thinking at operators and advisers is still that a
/64 should be given to an User Equipment.
This must change: the 3GPP specs and operator deployments must
give /62 to UEs, and not /64.
Why not a /N instead of just a /62
Hi Alex,
-Original Message-
From: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:alexandru.petre...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 7:58 AM
To: Templin, Fred L; Satoru Matsushima
Cc: dmm
Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not /64s
Fred,
Le 08/06/2015 19:08, Templin, Fred
Hi Alex,
-Original Message-
From: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:alexandru.petre...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 9:43 AM
To: Templin, Fred L; Satoru Matsushima
Cc: dmm
Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not /64s
Hi Fred,
Le 04/06/2015 17:10, Templin
Le 04/06/2015 05:42, Templin, Fred L a écrit :
Hi Alex,
-Original Message-
From: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:alexandru.petre...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 8:36 AM
To: Templin, Fred L; Satoru Matsushima
Cc: dmm
Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not /64s
Hi Alex,
-Original Message-
From: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:alexandru.petre...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 7:09 AM
To: Templin, Fred L; Satoru Matsushima
Cc: dmm
Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not /64s
Le 04/06/2015 05:42, Templin, Fred L
Le 29/05/2015 20:21, Templin, Fred L a écrit :
Hi Alex,
-Original Message-
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexandru Petrescu
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 10:59 AM
To: Satoru Matsushima
Cc: dmm
Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not /64s
Le 29/05
Hi Alex,
-Original Message-
From: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:alexandru.petre...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 8:36 AM
To: Templin, Fred L; Satoru Matsushima
Cc: dmm
Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not /64s
Le 29/05/2015 20:21, Templin, Fred L
Ah OK. thanks.
Slightly off-topic, I think that there is still chance for tethering with
single /64 if it is allocated as a off-link prefix.
But yes, I agree with you.
cheers,
--satoru
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Alexandru Petrescu
alexandru.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
In addition
Le 29/05/2015 15:30, Satoru Matsushima a écrit :
Ah OK. thanks.
Slightly off-topic, I think that there is still chance for tethering
with single /64 if it is allocated as a off-link prefix.
Yes, there is still such a chance. But it can not tether more than one
single subnet. Connected
Hi Alex,
-Original Message-
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexandru Petrescu
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 10:59 AM
To: Satoru Matsushima
Cc: dmm
Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not /64s
Le 29/05/2015 15:30, Satoru Matsushima a écrit :
Ah
Hi,
In addition to what Behcet says.
I read the example below. I think it is just an example, but just to
make sure.
Please - do not allocate /64s to end users in a cellular network.
Allocate at least /62s to end users.
This is to allow the smartphone to perform tethering (small network
19 matches
Mail list logo
