Hi Fred,
Thanks for clarifying.
We can maybe add your solution to the bunch classified as Mobile IP
based approach, even though it does not require client software in the
MN.
We have a PMIP based solution and a routing based solution.
All of these I think, form a good basis to work on in dmm.
Hi Behcet,
-Original Message-
From: Behcet Sarikaya [mailto:sarikaya2...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2014 8:31 AM
To: Templin, Fred L
Cc: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave); Brian Haberman; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] draft charter text updates in github..
Hi Fred,
Thanks for
I don't agree. Having two sessions is going to take us away from some
other sessions and it is going to increase the conflicts in our
schedule, etc.
Why don't we use dmm list rather than listing 17 or so names?
Behcet
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 3:07 AM, Kostas Pentikousis
k.pentikou...@eict.de
