- A Sustained IP address that just got allocated from the currently serving
network (hence the mobility is not activated until the MN moves off link)?
Yes. Thanks for your elaboration.
Regards,
Seil
From: Alper Yegin [mailto:alper.ye...@yegin.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015
OK, Alper.
I agree on your suggested way.
Regards,
Seil
From: Alper Yegin [mailto:alper.ye...@yegin.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 11:34 AM
To: Seil Jeon
Cc: dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] [dmm] #49 (ondemand-mobility): full on-demand mobility
support
OK, so now at least I
OK, so now at least I fully understand what this is.
My recommendation is:
- Please refine the issue definition in the tracker, so that people can
understand this the same way,
- And then let's ask the WG members their opinion about the issue (whether it's
something worth tackling or not),
-
So, the idea is, when this flag is set along with a Sustained IP address
request from the app:
- if the host stack is already configured with a Sustained IP address
allocated from the serving network, then it gets selected (irrespective of
the presence or absence of any other Sustained IP
Le 29/05/2015 20:21, Templin, Fred L a écrit :
Hi Alex,
-Original Message-
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexandru Petrescu
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 10:59 AM
To: Satoru Matsushima
Cc: dmm
Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not /64s
Le
Hi Alex,
-Original Message-
From: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:alexandru.petre...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 8:36 AM
To: Templin, Fred L; Satoru Matsushima
Cc: dmm
Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not /64s
Le 29/05/2015 20:21, Templin, Fred L a
