Hello Lyle,
I'm not sure I fully understand the scenarios that you have suggested.
Please let me know if my understandings are correct, as I interpolate
assertions and questions within the example text.
We’ll try to complete policy. I’ll set up a few use cases as well.
We’ll only focus on p
All,
Apologies for sending out tomorrow's meeting directly. Enclosed is an invite
for daily FPC working sessions (Wednesday through Friday). We'll focus on
policy and keep iterating as we progress.
Lyle
This e-mail may contain Sprint proprietary informati
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
METHOD:REQUEST
PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Central Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T02
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:16010101T02000
Hi Sri,
My comments are inline.
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-herbert-ila-motivation-00 provides some
> comparisons between ILA and ILNP, encapsulations, SR, and transport layer
> mechanisms that can achieve some effects in mobility.
>
> The choice of mapping system is critical. The mappi
On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 10:29 PM, Satoru Matsushima wrote:
> Hello Tom,
>
> To make the overhead discussion quantitative and realistic, I’ve made a
> spreadsheet of user-plane total overhead comparison by deployment scenarios.
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Fx8ilE_bQPkhFBoSd-
HI Tom,
Thanks for your response. Please see inline.
---
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-herbert-ila-motivation-00 provides some
comparisons between ILA and ILNP, encapsulations, SR, and transport layer
mechanisms that can achieve some effects in mobility.
The choice of mapping system is
Satoru:
There are 2 deployment scenarios for mobile core: overlay on packet transport
and
integrated. Can you identify the line items applicable to the overlay
architecture?
Kalyani
-Original Message-
From: ila [mailto:ila-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Satoru Matsushima
Sent: Monday,
